Talk:Pork belly

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Talk:Inihaw na liempo)
Jump to: navigation, search

Nutritional Information[edit]

The USDA food database lists 15g of fat and only 2g of protein per serving for raw pork belly. This 7:1 ratio of fat to protein seems completely off, especially when you compare it to the nutritional labels of processed pork belly products such as bacon.

On the other hand, the Korean RDA Standard Food Composition table entry for raw pork belly (which is referenced in several research papers) has a more believable fat-to-protein ratio, yet lists 8g of carbohydrates per 100g serving. This too makes little sense as it is a cut of meat and should have ~0g carbs.

I'm having a difficult time finding nutritional information for this cut that makes sense. (talk) 22:11, 23 September 2016 (UTC)


The lack of citations seems harmless in articles like this. The facts listed here are uncontroversial and certainly well known to anyone knowledgable in the field. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 23:48, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Regional variations?[edit]

The described variations are more like particular recipes, and neither traditional nor typical. For instance in the UK "a sweet chilli baste or sauce" is neither common nor traditional.Royalcourtier (talk) 07:08, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pork belly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required on behalf of editors regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification, as with any edit, using the archive tools per instructions below. This message updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 1 May 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:23, 27 December 2017 (UTC)