|This page was nominated for deletion on 1 March 2006. The result of the discussion was withdrawn (with a trend towards speedy keep).|
|WikiProject Software / Computing||(Rated Start-class)|
Removed sentence from intro
I removed this:
Opinions on the relative merits of different schemes can be strongly held, leading both to occasional "flame wars", and also to the development of several alternatives.
seemed like fluff. Hotdogger 01:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- I agree that it didn't belong in the introduction like that, and was unreferenced to boot. A "History" section would be a better place to discuss the actual flame wars, if any, that have occurred. John Vandenberg 01:47, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
That 'about' section reads like it is talking about linux, but doesn't it also apply to the BSDs as well? Mentioning Slackware in its own right seems a bit misleading. --Maru Dubshinki
- Well, I was referring to the init systems used on Linux distributions, and I felt it worth mentioning that some, such as slackware and gentoo, use their own init systems. -- Lakerdonald
- Fair enough. I've taken the liberty of moving the man init in see also, to external links, and linking to a copy of the man page. --maru 15:51, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
- Sounds good. Looks nice :D --lakerdonald
Hey, this'll be my very first Wiki edit. Go me. :) Anyway, this page seems very Linux-centric, even though the init program is present (but behaves differently) on every Unix system. For example, while runlevel 5 may be the default on many Linux distributions, if you switched a Sun/Solaris machine to runlevel 5, it would physically turn itself off. That might come as a bit of a nasty surprise if you're not expecting it. I've added a note to that effect. 184.108.40.206 18:44, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, nice job. I further explained that with AIX, and Solaris, the default run levels are different. Now I wonder, should the default runlevels be put into a table for easier readability. This table would also help make the whole article seem less Linux-centric. --Unixguy 19:15, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
"If the system administrator feels this is insecure, they can always setup a BIOS password." Surely this should be "bootloader password"? --Anon
- I think both. BIOSs can be set to require a password before loading the bootloader, and the bootloader can be passworded (I forget whether it blocks loading one of the kernels and partitions, or whether just changing the settings). --maru (talk) contribs 00:57, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- Well in the context of the Article, the BIOS password is not going to prevent someone from typing custom options into grub, lilo or yaboot. To stop the runlevel 1 loophole you need a bootloader password.
This article is taking shape nicely, but I think it could use a couple of examples.
Example inittab files
Typical SUSE inittab: (paste here) Typical Solaris inittab: is:3:initdefault: sS:s:wait:/sbin/rcS >/dev/msglog 2<>/dev/msglog </dev/console s0:0:wait:/sbin/rc0 >/dev/msglog 2<>/dev/msglog </dev/console s1:1:respawn:/sbin/rc1 >/dev/msglog 2<>/dev/msglog </dev/console s2:23:wait:/sbin/rc2 >/dev/msglog 2<>/dev/msglog </dev/console s3:3:wait:/sbin/rc3 >/dev/msglog 2<>/dev/msglog </dev/console s5:5:wait:/sbin/rc5 >/dev/msglog 2<>/dev/msglog </dev/console s6:6:wait:/sbin/rc6 >/dev/msglog 2<>/dev/msglog </dev/console Typical AIX inittab: init:2:initdefault: l2:2:wait:/etc/rc.d/rc 2 l3:3:wait:/etc/rc.d/rc 3 l4:4:wait:/etc/rc.d/rc 4 l5:5:wait:/etc/rc.d/rc 5 l6:6:wait:/etc/rc.d/rc 6 l7:7:wait:/etc/rc.d/rc 7 l8:8:wait:/etc/rc.d/rc 8 l9:9:wait:/etc/rc.d/rc 9
--Unixguy 00:48, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- On second thought, adding examples would probably be too technical, and not of much value to an online encyclopedia. --Unixguy 16:03, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
discussion about merging init and runlevel
- Sysvinit = an Init implementation as originally used in UNIX System V and now followed by most Linux distributions. There's an entire section devoted to it in this article. :) 220.127.116.11 (talk) 04:53, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
"init is the program on Unix and Unix-like systems that spawns all other processes."
Does init really spawn all processes, so for example a webbrowser that a user requested to start from a GUI is also spawned through init's services? --Abdull (talk) 17:59, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
- You're right. Init doesn't spawn all processes. It spawns its child processes which in return spawn their child processes etc. According to pstree on my system though a webbrowser is really a child of init. It would be correct to say that init is a common ancestor of all processes. 18.104.22.168 (talk) 05:09, 2 May 2010 (UTC)