From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Chicago (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-Class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Note icon
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.


Very much an advertisement. Citing their own marketing representatives is an inappropriate way to bolster the statements made on this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by anon.

Sounds mostly like an advertisement for their call center services.

I agree, this article should probably be changed or deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tunit529 (talkcontribs) 20:56, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Frost & Sullivan citations available at —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 11:50, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Not an advert - a useful reference for those wanting to join the company or to find out more about InterCall and the background. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 19:20, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Obviously an advertisment. The "Awards and Milestones" are the usual meaningless things that no serious article would list. Every company I have worked in or visited has 30 of these plastered on the wall in the lobby... (talk) 23:16, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Agreed. Long over due for improvement on this article so I will be doing a large overhaul including complete removal of the milestones and removal of peacock language and unsubstantiated claims. I don't like removing this much from an article, but the long time it's been since this has(n't) been fixed is evidence that it just might be bolstering.Sulfurboy (talk) 09:13, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

It's still looking like an ad. It has some notability (if the claim of 2.9 million users is true), but it is definitely not the largest provider in the world. There are startups in the video conferencing space that have over 10 million (some even 20-30 million) users. The article needs a ton of work, and I may hopefully find the time to do this some time soon. I will keep it in my watchlist to follow progress and chip in where I can. Good day! Meşteşugarul - U 14:51, 3 March 2015 (UTC)