Talk:International human rights instruments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Human rights (Rated List-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 List  This article has been rated as List-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject International relations  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia.
If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

Nomination[edit]

I have nominated the 99 Percent Declaration by the Occupy movement. Dualus (talk) 17:43, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

God, you're exporting the POV-push campaign all over the place. Note that the sources seem to reject the idea that this document be associated with the "Occupy" movements. Centrify (f / k / a FCAYS) (talk) (contribs) 17:55, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
It certainly meets the definitions. Do you think [1] (audio) could be related? Dualus (talk) 20:23, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Take a step back from your soapbox for just a moment and notice that every single other "Declaration" on that list issued from a major international organization such as the UN. The authors of the "99% Declaration" can't even get a bunch of hippies to vote on their "Declaration". Removed again. Centrify (f / k / a FCAYS) (talk) (contribs) 20:52, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
I agree with the removal from factchecker, their is no common concensus among the occupy movement. Therefore human rights is not neccessarily a priority/platform for the group and should therefore not be included.Millertime246 (talk) 21:05, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
As do I. Even if sources did say that the Occupy Movement is united around this, (which they don't) there is still no justification for the demands of a group of protesters somehow being put in this document. The idea is beyond absurd. Trusilver 21:45, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Hell, no.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:14, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Which is which[edit]

Dear Writers,

Classification point, Which conventions belong to UN general assembly and which conventions belong to international human rights law .

While in fact and at the end they are all laws belonging to human rights but as soon as this classification mentioned I would like to know .

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohamed Atef Ezz (talkcontribs) 20:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC)