Talk:Internet linguistics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Computing (Rated B-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Linguistics / Applied Linguistics  (Rated B-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.
 
Former good article nominee Internet linguistics was a Language and literature good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Prophecy[edit]

I changed "This will both linguists and web users" to "This study is intended to benefit both linguists and web users." It doesn't seem appropriate to make predictions in an encyclopedia. -A — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.217.97.247 (talk) 03:51, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Content[edit]

This article is nothing but a list of related books, and hasen't been edited in over 6 months. Should it be tagged for speedy deletion? RUL3RFLAME ME! 08:27, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Semantic Web section -- any relation to the page title?[edit]

I came here from a see also at Semantic Web. As currently written, I don't see how that section relates to Internet linguistics. Anybody care to improve it? Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 15:23, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your feedback, we have removed it from the internet linguistics page to ensure the page does not deviate away from the main topic of discussion since it does not relate directly to Internet linguistics. More information on it could be found on the semantic web page itself. Lai eric (talk) 17:45, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Internet linguistics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Rjanag (talk) 14:25, 18 November 2010

I have closed this GA review procedurally because the article is currently at WP:PR. rʨanaɢ (talk) 04:16, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

Re-nomination following closure of Peer Review. Remarks and feedbacks given at Peer Review has been well taken and amendments/justification were made accordingly. All further feedback and reviews are welcome at the GAN page. Thank you and we look forward to a collaborative sharing environment with fellow wikipedians in the true spirit of Wikipedia. Lai eric (talk) 04:51, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Internet linguistics/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: wackywace 07:22, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

This GAN has been closed procedurally because the article is currently at WP:PR. Please do not nominate this article again until the Peer Review has been closed. Thank you. wackywace 07:22, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks wackywace for maintaining the standard protocol. The peer review wasn't closed properly earlier on, which resulted in the listing of two concurrent nominations (PR and GA). The PR has now been properly closed and archived by the nominator of the PR. Lai eric (talk) 14:28, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

Re-nomination following closure of Peer Review. Remarks and feedbacks given at Peer Review has been well taken and amendments/justification were made accordingly. All further feedback and reviews are welcome at the GAN page. Thank you and we look forward to a collaborative sharing environment with fellow wikipedians in the true spirit of Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lai eric (talkcontribs) 16:21, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Twilight?[edit]

What do grammatical mistakes in Twilight have to do with language on the internet? The link says nothing about the connection, only that grammatical mistakes exist in the books.

It seems ridiculous to construe literary grammatical mistakes as dangerously on the rise because the internet is ruining them- especially when your only source is a link that does not make any such argument 173.30.9.91 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:32, 15 December 2010 (UTC).

Unnecessary and Ridiculous[edit]

Where is the article on "television linguistics"? And the one on "radio linguistics"? and the one on "newspaper linguistics"? and the one on "book linguistics"?

The original proposal that there exists a branch of linguistics for the Internet is flawed and based on unsound science. Because the Internet is a medium of communication does not mean that it is worthy of abeing a "branch" of linguistics, as is evident from the proposer's classifying his analysis along several already existing lines, the chief among them being sociolinguistics.

This article should be renamed or deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexlange (talkcontribs) 15:19, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Internet linguistics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:17, 31 March 2016 (UTC)