Talk:Interstate 175

U.S. Roads: Interstates / Florida Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	Interstate Highways
Locations	Florida
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tampa Bay (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tampa Bay, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Tampa BayWikipedia:WikiProject Tampa BayTemplate:WikiProject Tampa BayTampa Bay articles

History[edit]

If all of the information came from AARoads, it should be cited at the end of the section instead of its current location. If it did not come entirely from AARoads, then additional refs will be needed. --TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 05:35, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should the history section be remove? I honestly don't know how to fix it. They have mix of yellow and orange tag. --Freewayguy (Comm 90) 20:53, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The entire history section is basically fragments of info that was poorly written when I created the section. Parts of it was from AARoads, while other fragments came from the shuttered Bayciti.net. I believe the entire section needs a complete rewrite and expansion in order to save the integrity of the article and keep it from being deleted. Wslupecki (talk) 01:25, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why we have both orange and yellow tag; Talking about AA Highways is definitely original source. I fix it alittle bit.--Freewayguy ^{Talk Contribs} 19:39, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of South Pasadena for what?Rosemead?San Gabriel? Does I-710 have anything to do with this article when mention below yellow and orange tag?--Freewayguy ^{Discussions Show all changes} 19:55, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thouhgt you said AA Roads is not a valid source. For eventualism, they should have a valid source like DOT's maintence.--SCFR eew ays 02:41, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History Tags Revisited[edit]

The tag about the tone of the History section is nearly four years old. I don't see any tone issues at present (though the section is short). Perhaps someone familiar with this article and this WikiProject could examine it and remove this tag if it's no longer appropriate? Wabbott9 Tell me about it.... 04:22, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interstate funding[edit]

In 1976 both feeders were only going to get 90% Interstate funding to 9th Street. --NE2 15:31, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Interstate 175. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:03, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]