Talk:Interstitial pregnancy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Medicine / Reproductive medicine (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Reproductive medicine task force.
 
WikiProject Women's Health (Rated C-class)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
 

Too much jargon[edit]

Examples:

  • "namely that portion of the tube that transverses..."
  • "located in a horn of..."
  • "The interstitial part of the Fallopian tube represents its most proximal segment, and is described as tortuous with a length of... "
  • "Medially is the os (ostium) of the tube connecting it to the endometrial cavity and laterally the tube continues in its isthmic segment."
  • "The area is well supplied by a vascular arch..."
  • "Interstitial pregnancies maybe confused with angular pregnancies that are located in the endometrial corner close to the uterotubal junction..."

This sounds like terminology from a medical text as is not written for the general reader or lay person. Regards, —mattisse (Talk) 16:58, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

I tried to remediate without sacrificing precision.Ekem (talk) 19:12, 4 February 2010 (UTC)