Talk:Intrafusal muscle fiber

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Anatomy (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article has been classified as relating to microanatomy.
WikiProject Organismal Biomechanics (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon Intrafusal muscle fiber is part of WikiProject Organismal Biomechanics, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource covering organismal biomechanics. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

confusing for who are not competent[edit]

The term intrafusal fibers are used for both muscle and nerve fibers in the article, thus someone who is not so familiar with the subject may be puzzled.C39 14:22, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Separate Proprioception Topic...[edit]

I suggest that there should be a separate Proprioception topic with subtopics: Muscle Spindles, Golgi Tendon Organs. This would provide a better format through witch one could explain the facilitory role of muscle spindles (type I and IIa intrafusal fibers) and the inhibitory role of golgi tendon organs.

  • The word proprioception isn't even used in this article. Maybe it should.--Drewlew (talk) 18:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Splitting out fibre types[edit]

Hey Arcadian. Nice addition of the template. On the splitting of this into fibre types do you think there is enough information to warrant two articles? At the moment all the articles are left at stub length so I am concerned about splitting them. |→ Spaully 08:18, 6 May 2007 (GMT)