Talk:Iridion 3D

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Featured article Iridion 3D is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophy This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 29, 2010.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
February 24, 2007 Good article nominee Not listed
February 26, 2007 Good article nominee Listed
May 15, 2007 Featured article candidate Promoted
Current status: Featured article
WikiProject Video games (Rated FA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Featured article FA  This article has been rated as FA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Failed "good article" nomination[edit]

This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of February 24, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Weak Pass Prose seems written well enough, but I have a few suggestions. There are some commas where commas aren't needed (such as before the word and) and articles tend to flow better without brackets.
2. Factually accurate?: Fail I'm reluctant to pass an article with so few unreferenced statements. There are entire sections that only have one reference.
3. Broad in coverage?: Pass Very Comprehensive for a little-known video game.
4. Neutral point of view?: Pass Article seems to be written from a neutral point of view.
5. Article stability? Pass Seems to be stable.
6. Images?: Pass Good use of images.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. Thanks for your work so far. --Scorpion 05:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

It's looking pretty good at this point. I'd say do another copy edit, then try for GA again. -- Scorpion 00:15, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

New GA review[edit]

All of my previous suggestions have been implemented, so I grant this article GA status. Great job! This article is very comprehensive for a little-known flop, more comprehensive than many articles for the "franchise" games. One small question, would it be possible to add at least one source to the lead? I don't think sources in the lead are a necessity for a GA, but I would prefer to see at least one.

Cape Feare, an article I have been working on is currently a GAC, and if you could review it for me it would be much appreciated. Thanks for the time, Scorpion 18:49, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Reference material[edit]

Found this: Game Informer review. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 01:51, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the find. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 16:51, 21 October 2010 (UTC)