Talk:Italian cruiser Ettore Fieramosca

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian cruiser Ettore Fieramosca/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 13:48, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	speed figures in lead, infobox and body don't match Fixed gun bore and TT conversions in infobox and body don't match Fixed power in infobox not mentioned in body Added - I think Sturm forgot to include it when he made some tweaks. numbers of Hotchkiss guns in infobox and body don't match Fixed suggest adding conning tower armour to infobox Added breech-loading guns that were carried in I think I forgot to fix this article when you mentioned this in the Etna review (or maybe I hadn't started writing this one yet...)
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	some numerical identifiers for sources are missing. Available from Worldcat. Added
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Single image is licensed as PD
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Placing on hold for seven days for comments to be addressed Passing, well done.

Photos

here and http://www.history.navy.mil/our-collections/photography/numerical-list-of-images/nhhc-series/nh-series/NH-88000/NH-88744-A.html here] - same photo, different versions. Parsecboy (talk) 19:07, 7 January 2016 (UTC)