Talk:JETGO Australia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Australia (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon JETGO Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to for other than editorial assistance.
WikiProject Aviation / Airlines (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the airline project.

The article does not yet demonstrate that JetGo Australia is sufficiently notable to warrant its own article on Wikipedia. As a result, the article is vulnerable to deletion. Users with access to reliable published information about JetGo Australia should take action to enhance the article with information, and sources, that demonstrate the company is notable in accordance with Wikipedia's guidelines at WP:CORP. Dolphin (t) 03:45, 1 July 2012 (UTC)


Out of interest the logo used is not from the airline website which uses the same image but styled "JetGo", if we are using non-free images then we should use the correct one. MilborneOne (talk) 11:09, 13 July 2013 (UTC)


This article should be put up for deletion, I'll do it later. RetroLord 11:13, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

I believe this article should be allowed to remain. While most of the sources are from various regional newspapers and national magazines and they seem to verify much of the information from the primary source (company website), which does establish some notability. There is a significant amount of discussion regarding this company on forums/blogs that are not acceptable sources to further demonstrate community interest. It may be borderline weak against the notability criteria, but certainly will compare more strongly as the company grows and the article evolves. Can you please clarify on what grounds you feel it should be moved to AfD, or suggest how it can be improved further to justify its continued existence? Dfadden (talk) 15:24, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
A mention in a rural newspaper and the possibility of company growth is hardly a sign of notability. Lets be honest here, they are leasing a few small planes, they aren't some giant airline. RetroLord 12:03, 14 July 2013 (UTC)