This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Jack Thompson (activist) has been listed as a level-5 vital article in People, Activists. If you can improve it, please do. This article has been rated as GA-Class.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Cleveland, the scope of which includes Cleveland and the Greater Cleveland Area; If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.ClevelandWikipedia:WikiProject ClevelandTemplate:WikiProject ClevelandCleveland articles
This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. v. Thompson is a short stub article written from a single source from a flurry of news coverage in a month. This would not meet policies like WP:NOTNEWS or even WP:VERIFIABILITY. I don't know if this should be a delete discussion but it seems you could summarize and salvage that article by listing it on this page, between the other unsuccessful lawsuits from this disbarred lawyer. Jorahm (talk) 17:26, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think there's anything to merge; at most it would be a straight redirect. The article on the lawsuit is based solely on a single source that does not appear to meet WP:RS. It's already adequately covered, with sourcing in this article's section "Take-Two reaction". The lawsuit article doesn't even identify where its filed or a citation (either docket or F.Supp. reference) where it can be found.
The lawsuit itself shows no indicia of notability. It was in a district court only (no appellate case setting any precedent); was settled (so no opinion that might be cited to in the future). If this was in WP:AFD, I'd be !voting delete. I'd start an AFD, but not while the proposed merge is underway. TJRC (talk) 20:18, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I would support a redirect. It's certainly conceivable that someone would find the case name from a news article or blog or such, and copy/paste it directly into wikipedia. Fieari (talk) 00:24, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Done. If there's anything worth merging it can be pulled from the page history. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:23, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done. If there's anything worth merging it can be pulled from the page history. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:23, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Done