Talk:Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Bangladesh (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 


Both Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen and Jama'atul Mujahideen Bangladesh uses mistaken names and are less complete than Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh. - Aditya Kabir 12:08, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

POV[edit]

The articles first section has some weasel words. And it seems to me that the article is written from a American point of view. -- (Cocoaguy ここがいい contribstalk) 14:18, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Well I can assure you it was not written by a native speaker of English. What are the weasal words you do not like? --BoogaLouie 22:12, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Suggestions[edit]

I've gone through and tagged anything which stands out. A lot of the sources require verification, could an established editor please check those ones and list the ones which are correct in the section below, and tag those which fail verification with {{failed verification}}.

I'm not quite sure what else that can be done for this article. You may wish to consider adding the points of view of the organisation, but only in ways in which they are presented, not in the way in which you perceive it. That is, try to edit without considering the subject, but rather the content which you are adding. Removing unsourced POV words are also a good idea. Jame§ugrono 00:18, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Sources[edit]

Sources which have been checked:

Edits by 213.88.134.99[edit]

Someone should go through and fix the edits done by "213.88.134.99 ". A number of them are nonsense / unverified. I would, but I am not very adept at Wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.53.202.0 (talk) 18:58, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Merge proposal[edit]

  • Support Since one evolved into another and still both remained inter-connected... merge is probably the best solution to get the scattered info collected and organized. Aditya(talkcontribs) 12:53, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
  • I don't Support because JMB is the former organization of JMJB. Since it's been banned in Bangladesh, they form a new organization named JMJB. So, I think, rather JMJB need to merged with this article.--T@nv!r_ (Talk | Contribution) 09:06, 8 October 2009 (UTC)