Talk:Jean-Claude Mézières

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Jean-Claude Mézières has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
November 5, 2006 WikiProject peer review Reviewed
November 21, 2006 Good article nominee Listed
July 21, 2009 Good article reassessment Kept
Current status: Good article

Well written, POV?[edit]

I think the article is well written but in terms of NPOV it would be beneficial to have input from people who are familiar with Mézeières since it is more or less only one person who has contributed so far. / Fred-Chess 13:37, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

I must also inform you that Image:Jean-Claude Mézières.jpg will probably give you problems since movie screenshots are only accepted when they are used to comment on the film. / Fred-Chess 13:39, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

GA Passed[edit]

Congratulations, I'm passing this article as GA.

I found at least one phrase in French which needs to be translated:"Comment réussir en affaires en se donnant un mal fou." Would you please check for others?

--Ling.Nut 22:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! I've added a translation for that title. I think that's the only one. Joe King 23:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

GA Reassessment[edit]

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Jean-Claude Mézières/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:26, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria[edit]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    • Ref #3 [1], ref #25 [2], ref #9 [3] (Google cache) and one EL [4] are dead.  Done
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its scope.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused): [[File:|16px|alt=|link=]]
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    • Some referencing issues to be fixed as per above. On hold. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:42, 16 July 2009 (UTC)  Done
    I think that's all fixed now. - Joe King (talk)
    OK, keep GA status, thanks for your hard work. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:36, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Jean-Claude Mézières/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

good job! see if you can expand lead per WP:LEAD and then I'd submit it to our peer review process so you can get more extensive feedback so you can move to next steps (GA, A, etc) --plange 23:58, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Last edited at 23:58, 28 September 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 19:40, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jean-Claude Mézières. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:07, 20 April 2017 (UTC)