Talk:Jessica Chastain/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 05:06, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • When I saw that the article had only 10274 of readable prose, I was suspicious that it could not be GA quality. My suspicions were confirmed upon quick inspection of the article.
  • Miss Chastain is an elite actress. We should quite easily be able to find sourced content describing her most notable roles. E.g., in 2011, which is her peak year to date, the two award-winning roles are not described although her other role is. Thus, a reader could not even determine what her most notable roles were.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 22:18, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Most of the roles are not only lacking but a summary of the critical commentary should go beyond whether it was good or bad. Leading critics should be cited. Probably all her movies have critical commentary from reviewers who are notable enough to have their own pages. We should see plenty of comments from notable reviewers in an article like this.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 22:18, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • "With the release of Zero Dark Thirty and Mama, Chastain became the first woman in 50 years to have the leading role in the top two films at the box office." - weekend or yearend? (clarification needed)--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:45, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is that all there is to her personal life? Does she have any endorsement deals? Does she appear on most beautiful/sexiest lists? Has she had any previous serious relationships?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:49, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • She was Oscar-, BAFTA- and Golden Globe-nominated in back to back years recently. Aren't there some profile pieces that give us more about her personal life?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:52, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • This article needs a lot of work, but it also has a lot of substance in some places. I will put this on hold, but it has a ways to go, IMO--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:56, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I would appreciate if someone else would do this, since I'm not totally sure how to change the errors correctly and don't have time. Jonas Vinther (talk) 17:29, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I will post a note and give people 7 days to respond?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:17, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It has been over a week. No one else has expressed an interest. I am FAILing this article.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:10, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]