Talk:Jessica Wild

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability[edit]

Not quite notable enough for Wikipedia, I would say. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.38.117.174 (talk) 03:31, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's your opinion. She has huge following on the internet ever since she became a contestant on the show. That's makes her more notable than you.--XLR8TION (talk) 03:57, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, an appearance on a reality show of the scale of a Logo show and pretty much nothing else is not worthy of a page of his own, this info can all fit into mini bios in the show's page. Nobody knows who he is. There was a huge discussion about UK's X Factor contestants who were so much more famous than him, and everyone in the country knew who they are, and it was some time before they had enough credits to have their own page. Plus there's nothing to say about him other than what's written...and being more notable than someone who writes on here, like you are stating, is still nowhere near enough to have their own page. Read the rules Dollvalley (talk) 19:49, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jessica Wild. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:01, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jessica Wild. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:28, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jessica_Wild&oldid=1207822298"