Talk:John Erle-Drax

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Biography / Politics and Government (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Some dubious claims[edit]

Both the main sources in this are letters to the editor of the Times; at least one detail (the window) is a story usually attributed to Isaac Newton. I have a feeling I've seen the one about a newspaper delivery to the tomb before, but can't say where.

As to the issue of the name, Hansard seems to give him as "John Erle-Drax"; when he's sworn in, the record of his full name there is "John Samuel Wanley Sawbridge Erle Drax"; this is the same form used in, eg, Kelly's Directory, and in his obituary notice in the Times in 1887 ("John Samuel Wanley Sawbridge Erle-Drax ... Mr. Erle-Drax."). I'm not sure where the Ernle comes from, but the Sawbridge is probably a middle name. Shimgray | talk | 04:15, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Per the above, I've moved it to John Samuel Wanley Sawbridge Erle-Drax; it might be best at John Erle-Drax, but there seems to be an art collector (dealer?) of that name. Shimgray | talk | 04:19, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Aha - this explains it. John Sawbridge; assumed the surname of Erle-Drax in 1828 when he inherited the family estates from his wife's brother, Richard Erle-Drax. So would that make surname was two words, one of those hyphenated - "Mr. Sawbridge Erle-Drax"? I fear this is the kind of titular subtlety that leaves me confused... Shimgray | talk | 04:27, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
The "this is a dastardly lie..." story - which is probably the main source of interest in the man today - can be impeccably sourced; see [1] for example. – iridescent 21:41, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Yes, I found that and put it in. My apologies for the terse tone earlier! :-) Shimgray | talk | 17:11, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Further to the above: impeccable source for the existence of his mausoleum and its subsequent demolition in 1935-1937; Biography of the man from Dorset magazine (despite the amateurish-looking website, this is a bona-fide local newspaper published by the eminently-respectable Archant). – iridescent 21:56, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Oh hurrah. I was hoping we could find something in the Victoria County History, this is the sort of architectural weirdness they like, but apparently no-one's yet written the entries for Dorset.
I've been digging a bit about the window story - no luck either way yet. Shimgray | talk | 17:11, 1 January 2010 (UTC)