Talk:John McKay (attorney)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

United States: Washington / Seattle Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

WE MUST NOT CITE TALKING POINTS MEMO[edit]

I want to point out that we must not cite Talking Points Memo. IT IS A BLOG AND VIOLATES ABOUT 20 HUNDRED WIKI POLICIES. Regardless of the fact that CJR Daily says about TPM, http://www.cjrdaily.org/behind_the_news/how_talkingpointsmemo_beat_the.php, How TalkingPointsMemo Beat the Big Boys on the U.S. Attorney Story.

Remember DO NOT CITE TALKING POINTS MEMO! IT WOULD BE BAD VERY BAD AS IN TOTAL PROTONIC REVERSAL IF THE WIKIPEDIA STARTED CITING BLOGGERS.

Cite ONLY MAINSTREAM MEDIA THAT COPIED THE STORY FROM TALKING POINTS MEMO.

Do we all agree? Can I get a strong support? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.39.78.68 (talk) 04:21, 16 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

No, wait, what do you mean? It's not entirely clear :-\ rewinn 05:58, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What's Grounds for Neutrality Dispute?[edit]

Since nothing in Talk explains why it's there, I'll removed the pov-section tag. If you wish to put it back, please explain the POV problem so it may be addressed. rewinn 05:58, 7 April 2007 (UTC) for[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on John McKay (attorney). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:53, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]