Talk:Jon Cooper (ice hockey)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Comments[edit]

This should be the default Jon Cooper page. NHL head coach is much more notable than NFL player who played a few games. 205.156.36.1 (talk) 13:28, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Redirected this page to the Jon Cooper page. Scp333 (talk) 13:46, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus at this time. I agree that it's too soon to ascertain which of the Jon/Jonathan Coopers will become the primary topic, so status quo for now. Miniapolis 14:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)



Jon Cooper (ice hockey)Jon Cooper – He is now an NHL Head Coach, much more notable than the other Jon Cooper who is a former NFL player who only played a few games. Scp333 (talk) 16:46, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

  • Support. A simple hat note can direct to Jon Cooper (American football) and I see no evidence of the upcoming American football prospect Jonathan Cooper being called "Jon" so a disam page doesn't seem like a huge necessity, in my opinion. Even if the disam is kept, still agree with the move. Ravendrop 02:09, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Weak SupportNeutral I'm fine with either of the current dab system, or the dab system being proposed here. Canuck89 (what's up?) 08:02, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
  • Neutral With there being three articles with similar names I would lean towards leaving it as is with an eye towards reviewing it in a couple years if he has been a successful NHL coach and search results indicate its the primary topic. Right now I wouldn't think it is much more primary than a two year NFL player. And with most people shortening the name Jonathan to Jon even if the player doesn't I think all the topics as it stands are probably equally notable so a disambig page is the best option probably. -DJSasso (talk) 13:03, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.