Talk:Jon Jones

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Talk:Jon Jones (fighter))
Jump to: navigation, search

Discussions about whether Jones intentionally pokes opponents in the eyes MUST include the now deleted Tweet after the Browne v. Mitrione fight where Jon publicly admits Eye Poking is his favorite Technique! — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 21:03, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Biography / Sports and Games (Rated B-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the sports and games work group (marked as Low-importance).
WikiProject Mixed martial arts (Rated B-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mixed martial arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mixed martial arts concepts, events, and biographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
WikiProject United States (Rated B-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Youngest??[edit]

Wasn't Dan Lauzon only 18 when he signed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boils (talkcontribs) 16:57, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

I think they mean currently the youngest, not necessarily the youngest-ever signed. I can't think of (or find in my research) any UFC fighters younger than 21. --jhanCRUSH 05:02, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
During the UFC 94 broadcast, Joe Rogan mentioned 2 UFC fighters younger than him, so I changed the wording. --jhanCRUSH 02:41, 6 February 2009 (UTC)


This article is supposed to be about the fighter, not his brothers. Am I wrong to call for a removal of details about Jones'jonathan jones is alson his brother

brothers collegiate football careers? (talk) 00:51, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Family is often included in biographies, and I, for one, find these details to be quite interesting and a testament to the Jones' genes and what we call 'athletic ability'. (talk) 22:12, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

I am also want to know why the article does not mention his collegate wreatliing career? —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 19:02, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Do not delete[edit]

His brother Chandler Jones is a defensive lineman for the New England Patriots his number is 95.

Despite completely dominating the fight, Jones was controversially[1] disqualified for the use of an illegal elbow

It has been justified by the UFC commentators ( of that night ) and numerous MMA sites ( including Sherdog ) that Jon Jones completely dominated Matt Hamill. For the controversially part... The fight was thought to be a victory for Jon Jones before they announced the final decision, plus ther are some arguments that state that the referee should of stop the fight before the illegal elbows had been dealt.

Therefore these two elements are important to give a clear understanding of wat happen in the fight. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GSP-Rush (talkcontribs) 06:51, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Controversial or not that goes into the description of the fight, not the posting of the fight result. You dont see controversial stoppages listed as "controversial TKO". It's the athletic comissions official result. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 07:03, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

That fine. I put that at the beginning and went it was corrected i didn't touch it again. I was talking about this phrase : Despite completely dominating the fight, Jones was controversially[2] disqualified for the use of an illegal elbow. It prove that Jon Jones was winning but he did an illegal move and that happen in the fight. If someone were to remove this then people reading it would think Jones just lost because of some random illegal elbow. Witch doesn't give the full picture of the fight. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GSP-Rush (talkcontribs) 06:51, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

That's because people are too lazy to do it. Fight descriptions are encyclopedic. Paralympiakos (talk) 12:32, 13 July 2010 (UTC)


Regarding his record[edit]

His offical MMA record is 11-1, not 12-0. The fight with Hamill was a LOSS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wanderlei266 (talkcontribs) 01:29, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Jake O'Brien fight[edit]

Power guillotine choke?? Really? wow. It was a normal guillotine. slightly modified. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 02:54, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

BCX 5 fight[edit]

I am curious about Jones's BCX 5 fight on his record. It says that he won the US Kickboxing Association Light Heavyweight Championship during this fight. Does this mean this was a kick boxing match and NOT an MMA match? If so, then there is no reason to include it in his MMA record. However, including that fight makes his record 12-1 which does sound correct. If so, then my question is, how did he win a Kickboxing championship in an MMA fight?

Something isn't adding up here. I suspect the Kickboxing championship is in error, but since there is no reference associated with it, I can't confirm or deny this. Plus, my internet doesn't work here at my job save for allowing me to visit Wikipedia (don't ask me why). I'm going to add a "reference needed" tag to the kickboxing championship claim in the notes until otherwise corrected. Dachknanddarice (TC) 16:13, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Since no one seems to care wether this is legit or not, I'm just going to remove it. Dachknanddarice (TC) 22:00, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
I have a video of this fight, and they clearly award him the belt after winning that fight and it's acronym certainly suggests that it is from a kick boxing association. It was an MMA fight, and my guess is it's just one of those crossover moments where a kickboxing association, in conjunction with BCX awarded an MMA belt. Unfortunately it's not really explained in the video, and I'm sure there isn't much in the way of press about the fight, but it is official.Thaddeus Venture (talk) 16:31, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
It's up to you if you want to add it, but like you mentioned to me on my user talk page, I don't know if a video of them giving him the belt + no explanation as to what that belt really represents is enough to be used as a source for this. It's confusing to say the least, and he's never ever talked about that belt or defended it, so I'm still contesting that it shouldn't be included on his record. However, I will refrain from removing this information should it make it's way back on his record. I suppose maybe we should contest it's validity and not wether it happened or not then? Dachknanddarice (TC) 19:17, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
I was able to reference it from an old MMA Junkie article from prior to his first UFC fight. They talked about him as the USKBA champion, so it's a legit title, just a kind of pointless one. It should be made note of, because it's an important point in his pre-UFC career, but beyond that it doesn't need to be a major point. Thaddeus Venture (talk) 21:14, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
  • I hate to bring this up, because it's really a stupid nickname, but in this same BCX fight he was introduced as Jon "Bones" "Sexual Chocolate" Jones, so that probably should be added to his other name's he's gone by.Thaddeus Venture (talk) 16:35, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
  • God, please no. He is not known as 'Sexual Chocolate' and I think having some announcer mention it once shouldn't be notable enough to include it as a real nickname. Dachknanddarice (TC) 19:17, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Alright I just thought I'd throw it out there since he used it at least once, to see what other people thought, I agree though and I certainly wouldn't start a fight about it.Thaddeus Venture (talk) 21:10, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Reference 29 link[edit]

Reference 29 link needs to be changed to: —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 07:48, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Edit request from Austinbatista, 20 March 2011[edit]

Jon Jones is not the youngest Ufc champion in history at 23 years old. Vitor Belfort is the youngest Ufc champion in history at 19 years old Vitor won the Ufc 12 Heavyweight tournament on February 7 1997 to become the youngest champion at 19 years old. This tells he won the Ufc 12 Tournament , This show's his birthdate as 4/1/1977 , This shows Ufc 12 was on 2/7/1997 , and finally this article shows his age the tournament and what year it was. Back then who won the tournaments was the champion and held the belt if you need anymore info I will look it up . Austinbatista (talk) 23:35, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — Bility (talk) 00:19, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Belfort is the youngest one night tournament winner, but Josh Barnett had been the youngest title holder (at 24yrs.) in the sense of a division with a champion who defends his belt.--Phospheros (talk) 12:34, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

You can participate in a tournament and the next one you don't have to. You cannot defend a tournament. That is what Belfort won. Jon Jones is the youngest fighter to win a UFC Championship belt. Prior to him it was Josh Barnett.Solidmemory (talk) 00:14, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Time for a class upgrade?[edit]

I've noticed Phospheros has been adding a few citations and references to this article and it got me wondering if maybe this article is ready for a class upgrade to C-class or even maybe B-class. I'd love for some other people to give this article a read and maybe we can go about getting this article upgraded? Not sure if going from Start-class to C or B class means we need a consensus or need to file it for review, but either way, what does everyone think? Dachknanddarice (TC) 20:49, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

If you believe that the article has accomplished the criteria described here, you can reassess the article yourself. Once it is about to go to good article status, a peer review process will be needed, but for C or B class any editor that feels that the article has achieved the standards established in the guideline above can upgrade an article status. Personally, I do not like to assess articles, but perhaps another editor at WT:MMA might be interested in evaluating this one if you don't want to. I would say that the current state of this article passes the C quality without problems. I see some issues that need to be addressed before achieving B class, but I may be too picky with the criteria. Jfgslo (talk) 22:29, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks Jfgslo. I've had a chance to read through the Jon Jones article and the guidelines for C-class and B-class articles and agree with you. I don't believe this article is quite ready for B-class, but I've gone ahead and changed it to C-class as I do believe it meets those requirements. If anyone feels it does not meet these requirements, please discuss it here. Dachknanddarice (TC) 20:13, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Get a new picture.[edit]

Seriously, you can't even see what he looks like. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 05:17, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

If you can find a better image that has a free licence or is in the public domain, then its addition would be most welcome. Wikipedia has a very strict image use policy. —LOL T/C 23:52, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Jonathan Dwight Jones[edit]

Here are the references for his middle name from his official twitter account.!/Jonnybones/status/101026342312751104!/JorelTheGreat/status/101027401328361473!/Jonnybones/status/101027726756028416 — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 05:23, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

TKO (liver blow)[edit]

the finishing blows when he fought Shogun weren't (punches and knees) !!

it was one liver shot and Shogun tapped (but the ref. pushed jones off before the tap)

so should i change it to TKO (liver-shot) ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 14:17, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

No, Project MMA uses Sherdog for records.--Phospheros (talk) 11:52, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
i'm sorry but it was clearly a single liver shot and Dean pushed jone away — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 10:42, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia:Verifiability: "The threshold for inclusion of information in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth – whether readers can check that it has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true.", also falls under Wikipedia:No original research.

Sexual Chocolate[edit]

He is also known as "Sexual Chocolate"... PROOF — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 13:53, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Jonjoneschamp.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]


An image used in this article, File:Jonjoneschamp.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:29, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

I've a question. Did Jon Jones learn Taekwondo? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 12:18, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

"Bones" is NOT his real name[edit]

I can't believe I'm even typing this but someone keeps editing his full name to Jonathan Dwight "Bones" Jones when clearly "Bones" is a nickname (a nickname he earned in high school for his lanky physique). His full name is Jonathan Dwight Jones, please don't change this.Asphyx1 (talk) 02:33, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

There's a section reserved for nicknames under "Other names" and that's the appropriate place to refer to the "Bones" moniker. Asphyx1 (talk) 02:37, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Not the longest reach in UFC history...[edit]

"He also has the longest reach in UFC history at 84.5 in." Semmy Schilt have a 88 inch (224 cm) reach according to his profil on wikipedia, and he fought at UFC 31 and 32 — Preceding unsigned comment added by GatorMMA (talkcontribs) 00:29, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Question on the new picture[edit]

Who's that on Davis' shirt? --TheShadowCrow (talk) 20:56, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 24 February 2013[edit]

{{MMA record start}}
| {{yes2}}Win
|align=center| 17–1
|{{flagicon|BRA}} [[Vitor Belfort]]
| Submission (americana)
| [[UFC 152]]
| {{dts|2012|September|22}}
|align=center| 4
|align=center| 0:54
| [[Toronto, Ontario]], Canada
| {{small|Defended [[UFC Light Heavyweight Championship]]; Submission of the Night.}}

{{MMA record start}}
| {{yes2}}Win
|align=center| 17–1
|{{flagicon|BRA}} [[Vitor Belfort]]
| Submission ([[kimura lock|kimura]])
| [[UFC 152]]
| {{dts|2012|September|22}}
|align=center| 4
|align=center| 0:54
| [[Toronto, Ontario]], Canada
| {{small|Defended [[UFC Light Heavyweight Championship]]; Submission of the Night.}}
(I added <nowiki> tags for clarity) Just to clarify, do you want to change "Submission (americana)" to "Submission (kimura)"? HueSatLum 01:16, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Link to Carlos Eduardo leading to the wrong fighter[edit]

The Carlos Eduardo reached by the link in the fight records table, is the wrong Carlos Eduardo. You can check that due his weight class, Carlos Eduardo Rocha fight records and through Youtube videos.

Removed wiki link. (talk) 01:53, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Fighter or Mixed Martial Artist?[edit]

Boxers, kickboxers, wrestlers and athletes in general have their sport listed next to their name and other industries have their professions listed such as for example "Steve Austin (dog trainer)." Why is Jones listed as a "fighter" and not a mixed martial artist? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 18:27, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

High school championship record not complete[edit]

I recall watching a documentary showing Jones winning the NY state wrestling championship for his weight class, as well as said documentary providing voiceover from Jones himself commenting on his state championship. In this wiki entry there is no mention of the year as well as specific weight class he wrestled. Can someone update that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 06:48, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on 28 April 2013[edit]

Take out 'gruesome'. That teeters into the realm of subjectivity. (talk) 17:49, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Done Thanks! --ElHef (Meep?) 21:28, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Comments of the Klitschkos[edit]

I added a section under Personal Life about his comments regarding the Klitschko brothers. I also added a line on Joe Rogan's rebuttal to Jones' desire to one day fight a Klitschko. I believe the references are solid (mostly MMA Mania and SBNation). I welcome any polishing that can be done to it. QOlivieri 19:43 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Drug Test Mention in Fight Results[edit]

I removed the mention of the failed drug test from the fight results again (sorry for the edit summary, I accidentially hit save before I finished it) because the test wasn't performed for the fight. It was performed a month before the fight, so saying he tested positive for something for the fight is inaccurate. I think the subject is covered well enough in the rest of the article, although if more comes to light it could be added, but there's no reason to have that in the fight result notes when it has no bearing on the fight results and wasn't a drug test for that fight anyway. Chuy1530 (talk) 16:22, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Jon Jones vs Matt Hamil fight in record standings[edit]

there should be an asterisk in the notes section following the fight info. it should read (*Hamill declined to continue fighting after 12-6 elbows). Hamill had a choice to continue fighting, illegal shots happen all the time and fighters are given up to 5 mins of recovery time, but Hamill chose to quit. This asterisk should be there to let new fans who are unaware of this, so they know Jones does not have a technical loss.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 05:45, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

  • If you have a source backing that up, I'll gladly post it myself. Thanks. ComputerJA () 18:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
  • That situation is already pretty well covered in the body of the article, and the UFC offically lists it as a loss so I'm inclined to leave it as is. Chuy1530 (talk) 19:55, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 29 April 2015[edit]

Jon Jones is NOT the LHW champ anymore!! He has been stripped of that title!! Update this ASAP!! Reporterguru67 (talk) 03:57, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

It also says Jon made a court appearance for the hit and run incident on March 28th, if Jones invented time travel, I figure he would have taken an Uber instead. That's in the controversies section if you editors can't find that.

Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Amortias (T)(C) 08:02, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 29 April 2015[edit]

He is not one of the greatest fighters of all time, as stated in the first paragraph. It may be argued that he is one of the best UFC fighters in this decade. Not MMA, because there are no standardized rules for MMA. His wins are according to UFC rules, so in general, the references to him need to be qualified by 'UFC fighter', not just 'fighter'.

C'mon - enough cash to run back for was just spread out on the seat; Not in his pocket...? Sounds like a stoner concerned with his score; sandwiched the dope, folks.

Semi-protected edit request on 30 April 2015[edit]

"He is widely regarded as the best active mixed martial arts fighter in the world..."

the word "is" should be changed to "was one of" and the word "active" should be deleted as Jones is not an active fighter. Sjlefebvre (talk) 20:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

  • I removed the word "active" given his suspension. However, he is still regarded as the best in the world by a number of reliable sources. ComputerJA () 01:10, 1 May 2015 (UTC) (talk) 14:56, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

  • He is widely regarded as one of the greatest MMA fighters of all time. That is pretty much common knowledge. Besides, plenty of sources online back that up. No where does it say that he is widely considered THE greatest, but he is among the top picks. Whether his wins were according to UFC rules or not is irrelevant, because MMA is practiced IN the UFC. ComputerJA () 15:12, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. Jamietw (talk) 15:39, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 May 2015[edit]

"were law enforcement" should be "where law enforcement" (at the end of the beginning paragraph) (talk) 15:07, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Pictogram voting wait.svg Already done{{U|Technical 13}} (etc) 21:31, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Jon Jones has a LOSS. Enter it in his record![edit]

Below are links to several reputable sources, including his official Nevada State Athletic Commission .gov fight result, and UFC company profile indicating he has a LOSS to Matt Hamill (a person whose wikipedia article has a WIN over Jon Jones. How could both have won??).

Fix your article and stop being biased! (talk) 19:30, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Nevada State Athletic Commission Official Results
Jon "Bones" Jones - Official UFC® Fighter Profile
Jon "Bones" Jones MMA Stats, Pictures, News, Videos, Biography -
Jon "Bones" Jones Fight Results, Record, History, Videos, Highlights, Pictures, Bio - ESPN — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 19:29, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Sorry for the mistake. Someone tried to purposely add incorrect information on the page. Jones's article is constantly attacked by vandals who want to make him look good/bad. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. The editor who did this has been blocked. ComputerJA () 18:30, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 29 March 2016[edit]

Instead of title of the section "Hit and Run Incident" it should be "Hit and Run Conviction" or "Hit and Run Incident and Subsequent Conviction" or "Hit and Run Arrest and Conviction". Something to this effect to convey the story instead of making it sound like someone has purposely wrote this with the purpose of damage control. This is much more than just and incident, he plead guilty and was convicted of a crime. The header needs to divulge this information because without it some readers may not read it in full and just assume he was or was not convicted of it. Assumption to either outcome is not right it needs to eliminate any possibility of assumptions. It is the responsibility of the readers to read the article but when we can assure they will at least get the correct outcome of this crime. (talk) 05:09, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done for now: Thanks for your suggestion, but I'm afraid I don't agree with your argument. I don't think "Hit and run incident" would lead a reader to assume anything about whether he was convicted. The section describes all aspects of the incident, not only the conviction itself, so "incident" is a more accurate descriptor. I'm open to hearing others' thoughts on this. Adrian J. Hunter(talkcontribs) 12:20, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

jon jones 24/4/16 was a complete joke[edit]

bar the mayweather fight i havnt seen worse ever — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 05:14, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 16 June 2016[edit]

IBrokeTheBat (talk) 13:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Jon Jones Vs. Matt Hamill is a defeat for Jones. He has been disqualified. (It's mark as a win for Jones.

Yes check.svg Done  B E C K Y S A Y L E 08:25, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Losses to Cormier?[edit]

Why does Jones' record show two losses to Daniel Cormier?

First, Jones WON their fight at UFC 182 ( Also if you please check Daniel Cormier's wiki page, it shows that Cormier lost the fight to Jones at 182.

Second, the scheduled fight at UFC 200 with Cormier has not been, and will not be recorded as a loss by any MMA organization. The fight is not taking place.

It seems to me that someone here is just a little edit-happy with the news of Jones' being pulled from UFC 200. This is not a fight that will ever appear anywhere on his record as anything, as it is not taking place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 16:06, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Both former undisputed champion and former interim champion[edit]

Should they both be mentioned, or should we go with the Renan Barao convention? -- (talk) 02:27, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Estrogen Blockers[edit]

With media outlets discussing the allegations of estrogen blocker use, I see no reason per Wikipedia guidelines it cannot be included on this page. --DawnDusk (talk) 23:05, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Glad to see Jones fanboys will delete relevant information, regardless of citation. --DawnDusk (talk) 20:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 16 September 2016[edit]

"Defended the UFC Light Heavyweight Championship later vacated; Fight of the Night" to "Defended the UFC Light Heavyweight Championship later stripped; Fight of the Night." - He was stripped by the UFC, sources for this are present in the article already. (talk) 17:52, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Question: There are 220 references in the article. Can you specifically point out which source says "stripped". You can ping me when you answered my question. Ill make the change VarunFEB2003 09:36, 26 September 2016 (UTC)