Talk:Judiciaries of the United Kingdom

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject United Kingdom (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Law (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Requested move 26 April 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 23:12, 25 May 2016 (UTC)


Judiciaries of the United KingdomJudiciary of the United Kingdom – Standardizing the naming of articles in Category:Judiciaries, this should be singular, not plural. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:49, 26 April 2016 (UTC) relisted --Mike Cline (talk) 14:08, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Comment this is ambiguously named wikt:judiciary means the body of judges.-- 70.51.46.195 (talk) 11:59, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Support: its actually a rather logical move. "Judiciary" means the entire system, not just judges. Its more succinct and can be made uniform across other nation's judiciary pages. DaltonCastle (talk) 23:12, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose. There are three separate judiciaries in the United Kingdom, as England and Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland each has its own entirely separate judiciary. The plural is entirely correct. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:08, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Oppose per Necrothesp. Also oppose the alternate suggestion above for the same reasons - Judicial systems of the United Kingdom would be the correct title in that format. Thryduulf (talk) 22:42, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Tend to favour the alternative proposed by Thryduulf. Certainly oppose the proposal by Piotrus per the reasons expressed above. RGloucester 15:23, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Proposed merge with Courts of the United Kingdom[edit]

Same concept? {{ping|waddie96}} {talk} 19:39, 24 September 2019 (UTC)