This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Lillard, Kevin (2006). "Con Report: Katsucon". Newtype USA. 5 (4): 95.Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
Editing the KatsuCon page by KatsuCon members...
I wanted to add to this page but after the Microsoft debacle, I was unsure on how to proceed. Yes, I work for KatsuCon but since I don't get paid for what I do, would that be wrong? I am a department head for Loss Prevention and I generally wanted to add to the content by adding some of the history. We are at number 14 this year. I was going to write an unbiased article, not a fluff piece. I respect Wikipedia's policy where permissions are concerned and I talked it over with KatsuCon Entertainment chairpersons. They're fine with me writing and have even given me contact infornmation for people who were there at the beginning but no longer are involved. I would not be getting paid by anyone. I just saw this article was a stub and since I knew some information, I wanted to contribute. Kelcifeeney 20:31, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
It would still be a WP:COI if you add or make any major changes. However, if you can provide reliable sources, as I did above, it can help other editors write a better article. As for writing a more extensive history section, the problem with that is that unless it is verifiable through reliable sources, it would be considered original research. In short, we can publish Katsucon's history unless someone else has published Katsucon's history first or base it on the few reliable sources that do exist. --Farix (Talk) 00:25, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 15:46, 9 November 2007 (UTC)