This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help, please see this page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
I would just like to comment that I am quite angry that the page was deleted with only the vague phrase "it was a copyright violation". There seems to have been very little discussion about it, no explanation of how it violated whose copyright, and I am dissatisfied. Still, what are the ordinary folk of Wikipedia supposed to do against the "gods"? Chris Martin (talk) 13:24, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
In the article it says that "The genesis of the make-believe theory can be found in Walton's 1978 paper 'Fearing Fictions'". That cannot be true as I am currently reading a paper from 1973 called "Pictures and Make-Believe" (published in the Philosophicl Review, Vol 82, No. 3) where he already has a worked out concept of make-believe as the basis of representationa art. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 19:16, 24 January 2012 (UTC)