Talk:Klaipėda LNG FSRU

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Lithuania  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Energy (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Merge proposal[edit]

I propose to merge FSRU Independence into this article. These are two short article about closely related topics. Beagel (talk) 20:42, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

There should be a separate article about FSRU Independence as it is both widely commented on in Media, is a large and complicated ship and is of huge importance for the energy supply of the Baltic countries.

So if at all needed, there should then also be a separate article about the shore facilities. Ulflarsen (talk) 14:39, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

This vessel is an integral part of the terminal. All this information about the LNG supply to the Baltic states belongs to the article about the terminal, not about the ship. There is a significant overlapping. Beagel (talk) 18:37, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Klaipėda LNG FSRU. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 6 May 2017 (UTC)