This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cyprus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cyprus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
The article went to great lengths to give examples to back there claims and the history of the order comes across as being spot on. In my opinion I would recommend this article to anyone wanting to learn about the knights Templar and believe that it is accurate based off the editors in the footnotes. it explains its points with historical evidence and goes into detail in describing things. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.84.52.163 (talk) 02:44, 23 October 2015 (UTC) Patl (talk) 21:12, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
I have just modified one external link on Knights Templar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Semi-protected edit request on 7 November 2017[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Remove the "Entertainment" section at the beginning of the protected article, its an ad for a web site selling playing cards. 95.180.223.203 (talk) 17:19, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
It is also copyvio, copied directly from the site. Removed. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 17:42, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
The Original 9 Knights Templar were archaelogists and discovered scrolls beneath the Temple Mount and the Jesus Family Tomb[edit]
This article is promoting the old propaganda of 9 knights protecting thousands of Christian pilgrims. That's a mathematical impossibility. The current understanding is that this was a front for them to excavate the Temple Mount and the Jesus Family Tomb upon the highest hill in East Talpiot. They discovered some very important concrete information that conflicted with Roman Catholic dogma. 2601:589:4700:2390:C129:9F7B:16E0:CDCC (talk) 15:58, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
This article is full of misinformation and disinformation[edit]
You'd be better off going to Quora and reading my answers. John Templar.Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.163.80.115 (talk) 23:01, 15 December 2017 (UTC)