This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
I removed the quote as a copyright infringe if this is the only thing in the article. Here is the quote removed, if you like to write the article using this information:
""Another group of current hunter-gatherers that reside in the interior of Alaska are known as the Koyukon. Their ideology is based upon the conservation of the environment and respect for all of its inhabitants. According to Nelson, 'Strong sanctions apply to killing animals or plants and leaving them unused. Meat is carefully butchered and stored where it will not spoil or be defiled by scavengers, and the fullest possible use is made of it to avoid offending the animal’s spirit' (p. 219). The Koyukon never take more than they believe they can use at one time. According to Koyukon beliefs, not abiding by these standards can lead to bad luck, illness or death of the offender (Nelson, p.219). The spiritual beliefs of the Koyukon contain another lesson that urgently needs to be understood by all: Death will befall humanity if we continue to plunder and pollute the planet at our current rate." [Naciente, p.122]"
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Chipewyan people which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:15, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 18:02, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Oppose until the issue is addressed properly. These should be discussed at a centralized location.
There was a discussion once on whether the ethnicity should have precedence for the name, and it was decided it shouldn't. That could be revisited. But it really should be one discussion on the principle, not thousands of separate discussions at every ethnicity in the world over whether it should be at "X", "Xs", or "X people". — kwami (talk) 12:38, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Support per nom. An identified people should be the primary topic of a term absent something remarkable standing in the way. bd2412T 02:36, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.