Talk:La Jolla Playhouse

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The La Jolla Playhouse article makes no acknowledgement of this or any controversy, and it seems that it wouldn't need its own section. Recommend merging as "Controversies" section TritonsRising (talk) 21:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose, a wholesale merger of the content would give undue weight to the controversy, IMHO. Better to provide a link, or a short sentence or two to the "Page to Stage" which includes a wikilink to the article page.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:58, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Creating a "Controversies" section at LJP implies it remains embroiled in them. The Nightingale issue was five years ago, as of this post, and, although widely and broadly covered, cannot satisfactorily be stripped down into a section here. I have added a "see also" section here to the controversy page. — Wyliepedia 08:39, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Closing this discussion. The consensus was keep. TritonsRising (talk) 20:18, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.