Jump to content

Talk:Mary Chudleigh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Lady Mary Chudleigh)

Article name

[edit]

As the wife of a knight, her correct title was "Lady Chudleigh", so the article title should be "Mary, Lady Chudleigh" (incorrect, but clear) or "Mary Chudleigh" (also incorrect, but clear). She would never have been known as "Lady Mary Chudleigh", because that was/is the form used for the daughter of a duke, marquess or earl -- a gentlewoman of far higher rank than this woman held in British society. FactStraight (talk) 04:33, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This comment is correct: her married name was Mary Chudleigh, formally Lady Chudleigh. Source: Margaret J. M. Ezell, ‘Chudleigh , Mary, Lady Chudleigh (bap. 1656, d. 1710)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004 accessed 10 Jan 2010 The Lawless One (talk) 18:12, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now moved.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 15:50, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mary Chudleigh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Mary Chudleigh/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

There was no such person as Lady Mary Chudleigh or Mary, Lady Chudleigh. Being the wife of a baronet, she would be known to the world as Lady Chudleigh and to her intimates as Mary Chudleigh. Since the first sounds a bit too formal, I suggest the article could just call her Mary Chudleigh 86.150.54.166 18:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Substituted at 18:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mary Chudleigh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:20, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]