Jump to content

Talk:Lake Tahoe Dam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2019 and 8 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Emilyboyd3. Peer reviewers: Indybenipal.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lake Tahoe Dam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:19, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review #1: Lake Tahoe Dam

[edit]

The article is very well written. It flows smoothly and all the information seems relevant to the context. Also, there does not seem to be any persuasion (one way or another) regarding the content- the author is simply informing her audience. The links chosen also reflect well on the content as they seem to be reliable sources. All of the information and sources seem to be up to date and from neutral sources. Well done! Indybenipal (talk) 15:37, 6 May 2019 (UTC)Indy Benipal[reply]