someone removed the Rayleigh waves reference because they believe that it's incorrect; could they check the Rayleigh waves articles, because it references pacinian corpuscles as well.--Confuzion 21:01, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
This bot has detected that this page contains an image, Image:Skin.jpg, in a raster format. A replacement is available as a Scalable vector graphic (SVG) at File:Skin.svg. If the replacement image is suitable please edit the article to use the vector version. Scalable vector graphics should be used in preference to raster for images that can easily represented in a vector graphic format. If this bot is in error, you may leave a bug report at its talk page Thanks SVnaGBot1 (talk) 15:07, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- eh, personally I think the replacement is inferior due to the lack of percision in depicting the structures, and the increased effort to identify structures via their labels.--Δζ (talk) 03:12, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Golgi Mazzoni corpuscles only in the fingertips or in the fingertips and in the nipples/ areolas (sp) ?
The following link says the golgi mazzoni corpuscles are in both fingertips and nipples http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erogenous_zone#Chest Is this correct? I've not been able to access the science article cited for this statement. Can someone check or provide an independent citation/view as to this issue?--Δζ (talk) 03:14, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
I wonder why the Pacinian corpuscle has changed to Lamellar corpuscle recently, and also the Meissner's has changed to Tacitile corpuscle; I'm sure anyone would wonder why. Has there been a congress recently, in which such decisions have been made? Anybody? Meral Rc. 05:12, 31 May 2011 (UTC)