This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was no consensus, page remains in place. GrooveDog (talk) (Review) 20:56, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Latina, Italy is a much better disambiguation then Latina (city). TJSpyke 23:33, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Comment: in my opinion Latina should either be a disambiguation page or point directly to this article. I don't think the use of "Latina" as feminine for "Latino" is the least-surprise result for someone typing in the article's name, while the city would be. --LjL (talk) 14:17, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
"Latina" as feminine for "Latino" is a very common word. I suspect most native English speakers are unaware of this city. Have you taken a look at the links? Dekimasuよ! 06:00, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
You mean the references that have recently been added after making Latina a two-hops disambiguation page? Well, I'm not sure I'd trust a dictionary on this, dictionaries simply won't list cities in many cases; I'd rather have Google hits. Ironically, the first link (dictionary.com), when typing in "Latina" (not "Latino" as the reference has) does indeed give me the definition mentioned, but also provides me with ad banners about the city of Latina... ;-) Anyway, when I Google for "Latina", I get Wikipedia links first, then a politics site (apparently), then three official sites about the city of Latina in Italy. --LjL (talk) 12:59, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
I think Latino is the more likely search target than the town. Try searching "Latina" in Google and see how many results are about the town. (WP:GOOGLEHITS, I know, but that's just an example.) Jafeluv (talk) 18:56, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
I agree with the latter, and I have changed it. --LjL (talk) 20:05, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
At the moment the table creates a huge gap of white space. I presume someone - whenever - will be filling in additional text in the article. So, I'm leaving it for the nonce but if no expansion were going to occur the page would have to be redesigned.Dave (talk) 15:06, 5 February 2010 (UTC)