Talk:Laura Bush/GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

{{subst:#if:I like the structure, prose and amount of content (both textual and photographs). This article is also excellently referenced.|


I like the structure, prose and amount of content (both textual and photographs). This article is also excellently referenced.|}}

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    {{subst:#if:|{{{1acom}}}|}}
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
    {{subst:#if:|{{{1bcom}}}|}}
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    {{subst:#if:|{{{2acom}}}|}}
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
    {{subst:#if:|{{{2bcom}}}|}}
    C. It contains no original research:
    {{subst:#if:Good use of a wide range of references - all the context is cited properly.|Good use of a wide range of references - all the context is cited properly.|}}
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: [[File:|16px|alt=|link=]]
    {{subst:#if:|{{{2dcom}}}|}}
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    {{subst:#if:|{{{3acom}}}|}}
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
    {{subst:#if:|{{{3bcom}}}|}}
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
    {{subst:#if:|{{{4com}}}|}}
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
    {{subst:#if:|{{{5com}}}|}}
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    {{subst:#if:|{{{6acom}}}|}}
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    {{subst:#if:|{{{6bcom}}}|}}
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    {{subst:#if:Very well done, and I hope you consider preparing it for WP:FAC. I advise a copyedit from someone new to the text, please see Wikipedia:Peer review/volunteers and Wikipedia:WikiProject League of Copyeditors/Members for lists of editors who can help you.|Very well done, and I hope you consider preparing it for WP:FAC. I advise a copyedit from someone new to the text, please see Wikipedia:Peer review/volunteers and Wikipedia:WikiProject League of Copyeditors/Members for lists of editors who can help you.|}}

Wackymacs (talk ~ edits) 18:35, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I just recently began working on this article after I had the honor of meeting Mrs. Bush on May 23. Again, thanks for the quick, yet very through, GA review. Best, Happyme22 (talk) 21:11, 29 May 2008 (UTC)