This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help, please see this page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
With all respect of world it has to be said that Camila Vallejo is irrelevant outside the 2011 Chilean student protests so the content said in her article would do better if it was in a more contextualizad article like this one. Chiton magnificus (talk) 13:26, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
No, I don't think so. Generally, leaders of the Chilean University Students Federation are covered enough both in print and online media to be considered notable, even though the only article on the English Wikipedia is Vallejo's. Certainly Vallejo has received way more coverage than most of the others, so yes, she should have her own article. Diego talk 03:21, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
It is true that her name is bound to the Chilean student protests but almost no information is available about other leaders of the protest and the other languages Wikipedias about the topic write only about her. Raskiy (talk) 15:03, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Oppose per WP:BASIC, e.g. , to cite just one recent source. --Trevj (talk) 06:33, 10 October 2011 (UTC)