Talk:Lee Radziwill

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 21 February 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: reverted to stable title, Lee Radziwill, per WP:RMUM. In cases like this with an objection to a very recent move, please file the request at WP:RMUM rather than on the talk page. Please initiate a new move request if you would like to move this page to a different title. Also, note that the talk archives were not moved along with the article in the previous move; it's important to keep everything together. Dekimasuよ! 18:44, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Lee RadziwiłłLee Radziwill – See previous section here. Never should have been moved to use irrelevant Polish lettering. She did not use such. SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:04, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:21, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Early life and ancestry[edit]

Apart from the mention of parents there is nothing of ancestry in that section. - It should b e removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:16B8:5C2A:6600:4C68:5D23:E94:9633 (talk) 18:32, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Marriage Information is Inconsistent[edit]

The information box shows three marriages. The first is Michael Temple Canfield, which lasted from 1953 until it was “annulled” in 1962. The second marriage is the Polish prince (1959-1974). So what happened here? She married someone while the status of her previous marriage was unresolved? Well, no. As the article on Canfield indicates, they were divorced in 1958.

The truth of the matter is that the “annulment” was merely a “Catholic divorce,” granted by Pope John XXIII. Back then, the Catholic church was stiff and starchy and generally uncooperative about granting “annulments” so as to permit remarriage after divorce, but, hey, by then, she was the sister-in-law of the Catholic President of the United States, so the Pope could bend the rules for them. Ordinary Catholics did not get the benefit of “Catholic divorces” until after the Second Vatican Council.

The article needs to be changed to show that she and Canfield were divorced in 1958, not that their marriage was “annulled” in 1962. There is no reason to portray her and her Polish prince as bigamists. 71.223.77.216 (talk) 14:16, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]