|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Leo Wyatt article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|WikiProject Television||(Rated Start-class)|
|WikiProject Fictional characters||(Rated Start-class)|
- Nutty, if somewhat funny, profile of a "former whitelighter and now Elder of the Charmed Ones," who does all sorts of incredible things. Definitely not encyclopedic. Moncrief 19:24, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- No vote. Apparently this is a character from the TV series Charmed. RadicalBender 19:55, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- If you made me king, I'd delete because this is a minor character in a TV show - not what I think of as encyclopedic. But compared to others that are routinely kept, it's no worse. Keep but post to clean-up so the link to the TV show is obvious. (Do we have a naming convention that would help?) Rossami 20:05, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Added text to make it clear where he comes from. —Frecklefoot 19:56, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Hmm. I've already deleted this once because it read like patent nonsense and had no context as to what it all meant. As it's from charmed, I'd say merge and redirect with Charmed Graham :) 21:06, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Keep now. Tempshill 23:16, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Wiki is not paper. Saul Taylor 08:48, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Keep.Chris Perry, Piper Halliwell(-Wyatt), Darryl Morris created by the same user are fictional characters from the same show (and need cleaning up). They could well be redirects to Charmed, but I have a feeling that various fans will keep recreating these pages even if they are deleted. Might as well let them have them.-- Decumanus 18:07, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Characters are encyclopedic; we probably have an article for every single minor character in Harry Potter, I don't see how this is different - DropDeadGorgias (talk) 16:40, Mar 4, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. There's room in Wikipedia for well-done articles about fictional characters. RickK 06:36, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. But like other Charmed character articles... it is in major need of tune-up (right now it reads like a disjointed list of trivia tidbits.) AquaWarlock Jan 31st, 2005
- I vote to keep it as Leo is a very important character to the series, much like Spike or Angel to the Buffy series. The page description does need a re-vamp though. Artemisboy 18:18, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
When did Leo have the power to control time?? I'm not sure I remember, was it when he was an Avatar.--NeilEvans 16:43, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- I assume this is referring to the episode that he told the sisters he was an Avatar, was almost killed by the potion, and then reversed time to undo things. Although I was defniitely under the impression that this was done more by "them" than by him specifically, but if I remember correctly at the start of the episode he did affect a minor reversal (of a few minutes) without even meaning to, so I guess the category could apply here, though it's rather thin. --Maelwys 20:11, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
The article speaks as if Leo is still a whitelighter. "As a whitelighter/elder, Leo has the ability to orb (teleport in bright lights) to many places. He has a telepathic sense of location and of hearing his charges (those he guides) called sensing and can heal them. He is practically immortal, but he can die from an arrow of a darklighter, as can all other whitelighters." Shouldn't we change this? I won't until I get some ohers to ok the idea.~ Silence_Knight
~ Well actually if you want to get really techinacal it would have to change to past tense because he is no longer a whitelighter not elder nor avatar. He is a mortal.Jessnotdean 02:27, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- It's already been changed to past tense.--NeilEvans 02:51, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Haha then me stupid! sorry to waste your time
I was just gonna revert it back to Leo, but thought I'd assume good faith and ask for a citation for it. It's stated in the edit summary that the name is spoken in the series, so it should be easy to cite the episode it occurs in.--NeilEvans 20:00, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Revert if you wish, I don't really care. I cannot cite the episode (don't have the DVDs) but I distinctly recall either Piper or Paige referring to him as Leonardo (possibly the episode dealing with his Army days?). -- Huntster T • @ • C 20:51, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- It is Leonardo, but it doesn't really matter as he is referrred to as Leo. - Piper [ The Piper Halliwell 22:24, 20 August 2007 (UTC) ]
- In "Show Ghouls," the referenced episode, Piper and Leo are planning a family trip to Italy. Piper is practicing Italian, and it's in this context that she calls him "Leonardo." I always took that to mean that she was calling him by the Italian version of his name, not as an indication that Leonardo was his full name. So I'm deleting it. If anyone can find a reference that definitively indicates that his full name is Leonardo, you're welcome to add it back in. ThreeOfCups (talk) 03:26, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:LeoWhitelighter.jpg
File:LeoWhitelighter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 12:28, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
FUN FACT: While it is true that charmed and it's characters are fictious in nature. It also seems that while surfing the internet several non-magical, non-angelic types-human beings possess the same names of Piper Halliwell and Leo Wyatt. While these human beings who bear the same names as the fictious charmed characters Leo Wyatt and Piper Halliwell are in no way affiliated with the show charmed nor to my knowledge have never been used as the basis for the fictious characters of Piper and Leo. The same individuals who bear the same names as the fictious charmed characters Piper and Leo, range in ages from 18-60 years of age and can be found living throughout various parts of the U.S. and even in Italy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 23:28, 15 April 2009 (UTC)