Talk:Lieutenant colonel general

Military history: Culture / Balkan / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force
	Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present)
	European military history task force

Reason for Rank?[edit]

I find the (uncited) claimm that the rank is an attempy at rationalizing the out ranking of a lieutentant-general to a major-general dubious and perhaps original research. Major General is simply a contraction of [historical spelling deliberate] Serjeant-Major General. See the article General for a greater explanation. Dainamo (talk) 19:34, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is this rank "lieutenant colonel general" or "sub-colonel general" ? If it's referencing the rank of sub-colonel/subcolonel, then wouldn't it be "subcolonel general" ? -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 04:40, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Find a reference, and be bold, my friend. Shem (talk) 17:44, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]