Talk:Linzi District

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject China / History (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Chinese history.

Merge proposal[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
  • Oppose. Ancient Linzi appears to be sufficiently significant to rate its own article. On the other hand, Linzi District needs to be substantially expanded otherwise it would seem to have little significance apart from the presence of the ancient city within its administrative boundaries; perhaps it should be merged into the article on Zibo. Also, it's not unusual for articles on modern settlements to have separate articles on significant aspects, eg, history, transportation, etc. Folks at 137 (talk) 20:18, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Ancient Linzi is of great historical significance - with taking Linzi, King Zheng of Qin completed his conquest of the other Chinese states and subsequently declared himself the first emperor of China rm (talk) 15:47, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose. As the ancient capital of the State of Qi there should be an article for Linzi in the same way that the ancient capitals of Haojing, Ying and some other have one.

The above discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Linzi which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 04:30, 6 February 2011 (UTC)