Talk:Liquid metal cooled reactor

I thought that EBR-I experienced the first [partial] meltdown, in 1955. That's what the Wiki entry says, and that's what I was told when I visited the EBR-I site.

The first recorded nuclear meltdown in the United States occurred at the EBR-1 reactor on 29 November 1955. I have modified the Power Generation text accordingly. BluegillTriplePrime (talk) 02:12, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

An excellent source is Smarter Use of Nuclear Waste, http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=smarter-use-of-nuclear-waste. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.156.194.3 (talk) 22:20, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

The submarine stuff should be scrubbed, has no references. I can't cite my source, has USN ties. Shjacks45 (talk) 13:49, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Probably good saved content: Lithium

This content is probably worth to be added: but minimum needs a lot rewriting and shortening. Opinions? 217.233.176.164 (talk) 06:05, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

7-Lithium

Also nether used already ⁷Li is an excellent coolant and excellent secure moderator allowing also full thorium fuel cycle with more than 2-3 times heat capacity than water and moderation better than rare beryllium with very less neutron absorption(45 millibarns)(after capturing just decay to ⁴He over ⁸Be means not going itself radioactive). Lithium is melting 180°C boiling 1340°C means a huge usable temperature difference without pressure with about 3/4 (NaK77 1/4) specific heat capacity/kg than water and high possible temperatures without pressure (-loss and decreased overpressure risk) for efficient and compact turbines, secure high critical point (thermodynamic) 2950°C(causing also decreased specific heat capacity problem with water >374°C), strong negative VOID on bubbles security with less cooling loss, low density about 0.5g/ccm (hot), no expansion on solidification like rare bismuth (eutecticum), el. magn. pumpable over paramagnetism of Li, strong thermal expansion for thermal flow, chemical binding of tritium, iodine, bromine etc., most less reactive earth alkali metal, not spreading radioactivity like water (steam) and graphite smoke, price just about 5 mio. $ for 100 000l, 28 mio. t world reserve for Li with 92.5% ⁷Li inside etc. combinable with also suggested new extreme compact and secure (Full Zero Risk all possible cases at lowest price for GWe and kWh) pebbles pillar design from Kay Uwe Böhm with a long high tungsten reflector core tube (for example 3m diameter 18m high) for high thermal flow up and down around with some isolation concrete through cBN boron nitride(thermal conductivity extreme high 740W/(m*K) and there wanted neutron absorption) heat exchange tubes with normal lithium around flowing upwards and again around downwards then to turbines and back with fuel pebbles (out of SiC or moderating c¹¹B¹⁵N melting 2973°C etc.) inside ⁷Li that can be taken in and out continiously also for regulation and trimming with near no neutron absorbers, controlled and stopped with different size absorber control and stopp pebbles and maybe turnable all around from top to bottom control and stopp rods with tungsten reflector and absorber side and addable independant and secure working stoppsand core catcher system. Possible catcher materials are broad band neutron absorbing hafnium carbide melting 3890°C at spread dome directly under core, thin cubic boron nitride plates melting 2973°C upon thick cheap magnesium oxide melting 2852°C. If the reactor core is opend all should come out quickly and quickly spreaded over a cover holded by (also active electric meltable) clamps then a mass of sand (SiO₂ melting 1715°C boiling 2200°C) maybe with additional neutron absorber placed upon is keeping better cool than water with much boiling bubbles and takes decay heat itself never melting all if enough, not rising much pressure, spread risk and keeping near all down under with still closed quick spreadable high melting point pebbles. Around heat exchange (W/Mo) steel with ribs low melting concrete with additives like in glass production working for stabilization, isolation but in overheat situation as melting buffer and then again steel with ribs all shaped round and black for better radiation. The two different pebble sizes can be taken in and out by sieves at run time. El. magn. wandering field pumping of lithium can be done with not melting tungsten spooling and wiring through cBN etc. Preheating can be done also with cBN for electric isolation heating up a high melting material with enough electric resistance through tungsten etc. cBN has a strong one time expansion after backing usable also for fixing inside other materials tubes. Possibble is likely also direct fuel and extraction using continiously taking out fission products centrifuges etc. against leight weight lithium and replacement of nuclear fuel (ThC-PaC-²³³UC or ThO₂-PaO₂-²³³UO₂) normally more heavy than all (lithium bound or density decreased alloyed) fission products maybe using a separation medium like red lead and maybe additional separation over fluoridization and/or fine seperating melting centrifuge watching outflow for colour, reflection, radioactivity kind and intensity etc. keeping the radioactive inventory always extreme low in all accidents cases (likely <0.2% compared with Fukushima 2% Chernobyl 20% set free), decreased decay heat problem, extraction also of reactor poisons like usable samarium etc. at run time like normally xenon or of breeded ²³³U surplus and continiously controlled nuclear fueling instead trimming with neutron wasting absorbers.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liquid metal cooled reactor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090410205724/http://www.etec.energy.gov/Health%2Dand%2DSafety/Documents/SSFLPanelFiles/NAA-SR-4488-Final.pdf to http://www.etec.energy.gov/Health-and-Safety/Documents/SSFLPanelFiles/NAA-SR-4488-Final.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:11, 24 December 2017 (UTC)