Talk:Lisp Machines

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Business (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Foklore section[edit]

Mac, why do you keep quoting the "Folkore" section? All my research has led me to believe that that section is substanially true- RMS' remiscences say, Harvey Newquist's Brain Maker's history says it, Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution say it.. etc. What's wrong with it besides the colloquial and loose way it is written? --Maru (talk) Contribs 18:30, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

It has substantive errors and very poor style. See the article in Lisp machine, which is much better. It is written as some sort of parable, which is a completely unencyclopedic style. I thought it was a quote from the Jargon file, but I didn't find it there. PS I was in the Macsyma group when the first Lisp machines were built at MIT AI, but never had anything to do with either LMI or Symbolics, except of course as an observer. --Macrakis 18:51, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Yes, I know the version in Lisp machine is much better, as I was the one who wrote it... What would you say to copying it over? (And I also know of your credentials- back on Maclisp, I took a look at your user page which mentions all that.) --Maru (talk) Contribs 19:10, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
I was thinking of doing that, but hesitated for three reasons:
  1. The LMI parts are intertwined with the Symbolics and MIT parts.
  2. I didn't want to create a redundant article.
  3. I'm lazy.
--Macrakis 19:46, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
I suppose I'll just copy it over, tweak, and add a main template for the fork. Later though. --Maru (talk) Contribs 03:14, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lisp Machines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:30, 16 May 2017 (UTC)