Talk:List of Ajax frameworks
|WikiProject Computing||(Rated List-class, Low-importance)|
Sajax is not just PHP, it also has implementations for python, coldfusion, IO, Ruby, Perl, Lua and ASP. So it is incorrect to simply list it under PHP —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 00:10, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
I've removed red-linked articles from large sections; I've left a couple of red-links where there are no other examples. It would be good if we could have articles created for, say, Wt - if this is the only example of a C Ajax framework it's surely notable? Cheers, This flag once was red 03:11, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Backbase in wrong list?
- Hmmm, the Backbase article doesn't really help:
- I'm reading that as if (a) Backbase is a serverside framework using JSF; or (b) Backbase is a clientside framework that can be used with any serverside framework.
- I'll try and dig out some more information about Backbase and make a move if necessary.
- Cheers, This flag once was redpropagandadeeds 11:16, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
NPOV and Formatting?
- I agree. This appears to be a slanted article and needs input from more editors and experts in the field. I suggest someone get the word out about this to the Ajax community so it gets cleaned up. Otherwise it is likely to be proposed for deletion. Sreed888 (talk) 21:10, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
The reference link to the survey by Burton Group which is evidently the only basis for selecting frameworks for inclusion in this list is just some survey monkey pages, has no association with any organization and is unverifiable data. Who is the Burton Group, what were their survey methods, etc? Sreed888 (talk) 21:10, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- I found the web site for the survey (Ajaxian 12/09 Survey). Evidently it was conducted by Ajaxian magazine by a prior employee of Burton Group but not by Burton Group. Here is what Ajaxian says about the survey: "Thanks to the Ajaxian community for getting in feedback so quickly on the third annual survey. Richard has written up his thoughts on the data, which we have to remember, accounts for a small percentage of developers, and those that visit Ajaxian are probably not the norm." This is an inadequate basis for determining what to include in this list. Sreed888 (talk) 21:40, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Propose for Deletion?
This is an inadequate article that appears to be mostly promotion for editors' pet frameworks. Unless someone knowledgeable in the field gets in here to clean it up I propose we drop it. Jojalozzo (talk) 02:51, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- It was originally created to stop editors adding their pet frameworks to Ajax framework ;-) Since then we've been fire-fighting here instead - typically removing the non-wiki-linked frameworks (like the ones you removed recently). Not sure whether deletion is or isn't the answer - I'm mindful that if it is deleted "Ajax framework" will be targeted again, but also mindful that that's no reason not to delete. Cheers, TFOWRThis flag once was red 09:52, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- Why visitors want to delete each article that is an issue for them? There is a lot of other lists on Wikipedia, this one is as legitimate that any other. Macaldo (talk) 18:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Apart that, where is the discussion about neutrality suggested by the banner on top of the article? Macaldo (talk) 18:12, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of Ajax frameworks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100703095339/http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActionView/Helpers/PrototypeHelper.html to http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActionView/Helpers/PrototypeHelper.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
You may set the
|checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting
|needhelp= to your help request.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
If you are unable to use these tools, you may set
|needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.