Talk:List of Indian intelligence agencies
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of Indian intelligence agencies article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC)
[edit]I could not find Joint Intelligence Committee here, why? I could improve the article by adding one paragraph about it. Mr T(Talk?) (New thread?) 16:36, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Yes, you can add that and improve the article. Krishna Kaasyap 14:09, 27 October 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krishna Kaasyap (talk • contribs)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of Indian intelligence agencies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121126051106/http://www.fas.org/irp/world/india/ib/index.html to https://fas.org/irp/world/india/ib/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:32, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Adding CBI
[edit]I couldn't find CBI listed in this article. Can I add some content based on this and improve this article Krishna Kaasyap 14:06, 27 October 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krishna Kaasyap (talk • contribs)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on List of Indian intelligence agencies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090410074217/http://narcoticsindia.nic.in/Aboutus.htm to http://narcoticsindia.nic.in/Aboutus.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091001180125/http://www.dri.nic.in/default.asp to http://www.dri.nic.in/default.asp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121120042901/http://dri.nic.in/General/aspCharter.asp to http://www.dri.nic.in/General/aspCharter.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:00, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Blanking
[edit]I restored the article to the earlier version of 19:31, 17 March 2019, because essentially the entire existing article had been repeatedly blanked without explanation by 116.72.208.6 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and Rams are (talk · contribs). It was replaced with an unsourced table and text copied from the British intelligence agencies article. I'm copying the following message that was subsequently left on my talk page since it's about the article content so it's best discussed here:
I only removed the unrelated agencies as , some of the agencies named in List of Indian intelligence agencies are law enforcement agencies and don't function as intelligence agencies. I am an Indian and I know the functions of these agencies. I have followed format of British intelligence agencies, for this page. Rams are (talk) 6:30, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Rams are, thank-you for your explanation. Certainly the article could use some cleanup. But I don't see the justification for deleting the entire contents of the article. From what I can see, most of the entries removed do in fact have a function of gathering intelligence, with about half having the word "intelligence" in their name. Also, for the removed entries as well as the ones that were kept, the large amounts of encyclopedic text with accompanying references were deleted. This should not be done without clearly-explained good reasons and consensus. It left the article completely unsourced. It doesn't matter if, as you said, you are an Indian and know the functions of these agencies - all information must be verifiable in reliable, published sources, not from the personal experience and knowledge or opinion of Wikipedia editors as that may be "original research". Also please note that this is a "list of" article, and does not necessarily have the same formatting or criteria for inclusion as the "British intelligence agencies" article. --IamNotU (talk) 21:49, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Rams are (talk · contribs), I noticed that you have once again repeated the blanking of the article and its replacement with unsourced and copypasted material. I have restored it to the previous status quo. Please discuss the issue here, or follow one of the procedures at WP:DISPUTE, and do not continue to revert to your preferred version without consensus, thank-you. --IamNotU (talk) 14:13, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Anti Crime Organisation
[edit]Information by Ministry of Home Affairs Anti13931 (talk) 13:42, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Information by Ministry of Home Affairs Anti13931 (talk) 14:01, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- Anti13931, I don't understand your comments. Please explain. What is "Anti Crime Organisation"? Why do you say "Information by Ministry of Home Affairs"? Thanks. --IamNotU (talk) 15:02, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
INDIAN SECURITY
[edit]HOW CAN I JOIN THESE AGENCIES ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4053:58E:DDE8:BD72:9893:FE7E:3CF6 (talk) 07:32, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned references in List of Indian intelligence agencies
[edit]I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of List of Indian intelligence agencies's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "FAS":
- From Indian Armed Forces: "Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA)". Global Security.org. Archived from the original on 23 July 2009. Retrieved 14 July 2009.
- From Defence Intelligence Agency (India): "Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA)". Global Security.org. Retrieved 2009-07-14.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:56, 23 October 2021 (UTC)