Talk:List of King George V Playing Fields in Surrey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Surrey (Rated List-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 List  This article has been rated as List-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject England (Rated List-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 List  This article has been rated as List-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Untitled[edit]

Resolving template issue with the URL http://www.crawleydownvillage.co.uk/amenities/?ID=23&Email=&Category=Amenities for crawley down village Fiddle Faddle 20:54, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Stoneleigh and Worcester Park rows[edit]

I agree with the amalgamation only of there is not a place alphabetically between Stoneleigh and Worcester Park that has a KGVF :) if there is one, then the apparently redundant row should be reinstated. This page (and similar pages) is currently very much "Work in Progress". I'm currently creating the rows that are easy to find in the family of pages, and then going to work on those difficult to find. Fiddle Faddle 08:36, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

West Ewell is between them in the alphabet. I have reinstated the independent row for Stoneleigh. While there is potential for discussion over the naming of Ewell and parts therefo, the maps seem clear that there is a district by this name, rather than just "Ewell". If no more locations intervene, let's reconsider Stoneleigh, otherwise lets leave it here while the article is developed. Fiddle Faddle 12:15, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Trivia[edit]

Much as we continue respect Geo. V or the name of each field would have been changed a long while ago, does anyone else agree that this list is trivial and unencyclopedic, bearing in mind what Wikipedia is NOT? As a compromise perhaps a Category rather than a List would be more appropriate? Adam37 (talk) 14:34, 15 November 2012 (UTC)