Talk:List of Medal of Honor recipients for World War I

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Featured list List of Medal of Honor recipients for World War I is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
July 11, 2009 Featured list candidate Not promoted
August 18, 2009 Featured list candidate Not promoted
September 12, 2009 Featured list candidate Promoted
Current status: Featured list

—== The formatting got screwed up somewhere along the line... ==


G'Day All--

The formatting for this page got munged somewhere along the line. I don't know the most efficient way to fix it. Undo is not enough. Can't an experienced editor help, please? Thanks. JMOprof (talk) 15:02, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Fixed, just a missing bracket at the end of the table. Cheers, — jwillbur 04:17, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
J—thank you. The sidebar is also screwy, but it seems screwy on many pages (ie WWII recipients, etc). I can't see any errors, but I note that it is under review. Can you say if that is all connected? JMOprof (talk) 14:09, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
It's unrelated. It'll go back to normal once the tfd is closed. — jwillbur 01:08, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
J—Then it is connected, No? Thanks for the help. JMOprof (talk) 01:27, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Oh, I thought you were asking if it was connected to the original problem of the formatting on this page being messed up. Anyways... yes, Template:Medal of Honor recipients is wonky because of the tfd so any page which includes it will look funny. — jwillbur 01:49, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
J—Thanks. Bated breath until it's resolved. ☺ JMOprof (talk) 04:09, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Photo for Patrick Regan[edit]

I am not a editing kind of guy but there is a photo of Patrick J Regan at

The website seems to indicate that all uploaded material must be copyright free. Can the editor sof this page review and capture this image.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 01:34, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Lengthy introduction[edit]

The first three paragraphs of the introduction seem a little unnecessary—they're more of a general explanation of the background of the start of World War I than anything related to the actual topic of the article. Would it be prudent to condense/remove these paragraphs? YesPretense (talk) 02:32, 26 April 2015 (UTC)