Talk:List of National Football League retired numbers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Former FLC List of National Football League retired numbers is a former featured list candidate. Please view the link under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. Once the objections have been addressed you may resubmit the article for featured list status.
January 27, 2014 Featured list candidate Not promoted


WikiProject National Football League (Rated List-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 List  This article has been rated as List-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

Seahawks #12[edit]

The Seattle Seahawks have retired the number 12 as an honor to their fans, often called the 12th Man. That should be listed here, even without a specific player being associated with that number. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.30.147.14 (talk) 06:22, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Seahawks #12 was at one time in this list; I don't know when it was removed or why. But if it is restored to this list, there will have to be a couple of changes:
(1) The lead sentence (Teams in the National Football League retire jersey numbers of players who ...) will need to be changed
(2) the article name will need to be changed.
Arguably, Seahawks #12 was not 'retired' in the sense that word is commonly understood. Overall, I don't think that it is such a good idea to include Seahawks #12 in the list. However, it may be appropriate to include a sentence about it at some point in the article, maybe in the last paragraph in the lead. YBG (talk) 03:57, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

References[edit]

nfl.com is now referenced; info not found there is marked {{Citation needed|date=October 2009}}, so I've removed the {{Unreferenced|date=September 2008}} tag. YBG (talk) 08:17, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

The references marked <ref name=NFL> were originally from a page on the nfl.com website which has now disappeared. At some point, the URL was changed to point to about.com, which I'm not sure is considered reliable. In any event, I am rectifying differences between that list and the WP page as follows:
  • Add reference for Rams 28(Faulk)
  • Delete ref, add[citation needed]: Saints 51(Mills) & 57(Jackson), Seahawks 71(Jones), Steelers 75(Greene), Eagles 5(McNabb), Bears 89(Ditka), Lions 20(Sanders)
YBG (talk) 03:01, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Also added 4 Atlanta numbers (57 VanNote, 10 Bartowski, 60 Nobis, 31 Andrews) which are listed in the reference despite the fact that the lead says that the Falcons traditionally do not retire jersey numbers. YBG (talk) 03:34, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Years or seasons[edit]

Is the new column the years played or the seasons played? That is, 1981-1985 could mean 4 seasons ending with the superbowl in 1985 or 5 seasons with or without post-season appearance in 1986. I suspect it means the latter, in which case it would be better to change to column title. But to completely disambiguate the matter, it might be good to add the total number of seasons, either in the same column "5 (1981-85)" or in separate columns "Seasons|Years played with team" or "Seasons played with team|Total". A combined column would require care (e.g., using {{nts}}) to make sorting work correctly. Separate columns would enable sorting either by total years played or by the first year played. YBG (talk) 15:29, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Edit Request[edit]

check-mark
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Can somebody create the nomination page for me? Reason: I recently added citations and added pictures, and now think that it is worthy of being a featured list. --71.126.8.99 (talk) 23:09, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

@71.126.8.99 Yes check.svg Done