Talk:List of platyrrhines

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured listList of platyrrhines is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starList of platyrrhines is part of the Primates series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 20, 2023Featured list candidatePromoted
March 26, 2024Featured topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured list

Assessment[edit]

The list looks very good. Are you just waiting to fill in the average weights, or are they not studied? Anyway, the list follows the general format of an existing FL for WP:PRIMATES (List of lemur species), but if you want to take this list to FL, you'll need a more significant lead and some pictures. I still think it would be good to use the new "heading" parameter for the Template:MSW3 Groves so that the numerous references can be distinguished if you just look at the reference list. Otherwise, the importance is set correctly, and there's not much we can do in terms of giving it a class rating without submitting as a FLC. – VisionHolder « talk » 11:44, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to say that I do not have a good, up-to-date source for the latest listing of New World monkey species, so I can't verify whether or not the list itself is accurate and complete. But in terms of appearance and structure, it looks very good. – VisionHolder « talk » 12:03, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yup. I've added the heading parameter now... I had to let it percolate through my brain for the best way to do it en masse. And when I'm home in June I'll have access to a decent source for NW monkey species. And once I have that source, I'll also be able to craft a better lead. I'll take a look at the lemur list to get a feel for a good balance of pictures. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:49, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Extinct species[edit]

The key implies that wherever this data came from included extinct species, too, which are actually what just I was looking for. I presume these will be added in the future? 72.130.58.85 (talk) 16:19, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, no one is working on this article at present, so they're not likely to be added soon. I'll remove that from the key for now. I'm sorry the list was misleading. I suggest searching Google Scholar, and I'm sure you can find a few fossil species. If anything, find some reliable sources and bring the information back here, adding the entries yourself. If you need help with the code for tables or references, just post your findings and sources here and I'll help. – Maky « talk » 18:37, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of New World monkey species. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:25, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]