This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Would the list be easier to manage f it were broken up into parent classes of ships?E ie Voyager being a science focused vessel. I would also think that adding a small description of the class or infobox with relevant info would be fitting. Sorry for broken code. will try to fix later: Infobox ship begin Details (Picture) Infobox ship Class |Name = Intrepid |firstlaunched = Stardate / Earth date |Timeline = Primary |Universe = Primary |nxdesig = NX-74600
I think that the various ships should be referenced by where they were introduced. Maybe a reference column... - Jack Sebastian (talk) 21:40, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
I would agree, but I'm not convinced this article should even exist - seems like fancruft to me, and I say that as someone with bookshelves full of Trek lit. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:42, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
I'm a second generation Trek fan, and I'd tend to agree; this is fancruft, and pretty much a list. That said, there must be references for this sort of thing. There's over 50 years of Trek pseudo-tech manuals and whatnot. There should be info all over the place. If we can find refs, we're good, If not, this thing might get deleted if someone with an itchy trigger finger comes to town. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 06:05, 30 September 2016 (UTC)