This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
Hi. I would not put the tailcodes in the page, since they are due to change. CVG/CVW-10 had the tailcode "AK" which was given to CVW-13 in the 80s. In 1986 the short-lived CVW-10 got "NM", previously CVW-21. It is also not correct that "A" was always for the Atlantic Fleet and "N" for the Pacific Fleet. Mostly, but CVW-16 was a PAC unit, tailcode "AH".
I would also put the air groups/wings in one file that are related to each other. See: http://www.history.navy.mil/download/history/app15.pdf --cobatfor 23:14h, 21 Sep 2007 (GMT)
You are all correct save for CVW-21's fin flash, which was "NP". Yes CVW-16 was a pacific fleet unit with the "AH" fin flash, and btw had the dubious distinction of incuring the highest loss rates of any carrier air wing during the Vietnam War. I'm not surprised it got disestablished. 58.164.45.129 (talk) 15:17, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Navalaviator84 with this edit [1] you haven't said why it is necessary to have this level of heading (ie with one equals sign either side of the title). The error shows up here Wikipedia Check Wikipedia as a High category error. The text accompanying the maintenance category states:
"A heading starts with "= XY =". It should be "== XY ==". This causes organisational problems (See [[WP:MOSHEAD]]), as well as accessibility problems, especially with screen readers. (See [[WP:ACCESSIBILITY]] and Web Content Accessibility Guidelines)"
.jpg)
