Talk:List of national geoparks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

It's not clear what 'designated at the national level' actually means - it is likely to be more meaningful in some countries than others. Some geoparks in the list are simply 'self-appointed' (which is fine if that works for them - not a problem) whilst some are only really designated at international level, since there exists no national body within that country with that capability. cheersGeopersona (talk) 21:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Despite all the jumping about of the Hong Kong Global Geopark of China, it presumably no longer belongs on this list at all, as it is no longer a 'National' Geopark. As Geopersona asks above, who should be, and not be, on the list, and where should the entries come from. If it should exclude all global and European Geoparks, as the intro sort of suggests, it will benefit from quite a bit of pruning. At one point the intro said 'This list includes areas that include the term 'Geopark' in their names but are not members of either the European Geoparks Network or the UNESCO Global Network of Geoparks.', which at least clarifies what the 'not to be confused with' statement means. RobinLeicester (talk) 02:06, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

US Geoparks[edit]

I could not find any evidence for US geoparks on UNESCO's site... can anyone else? Also, there is a red rock canyon in California and Nevada, but the link under California links to the Nevada location. Any thoughts on this? Is it both, one, or neither? QFL 24-7 bla ¤ cntrb ¤ kids ¤ pics ¤ vids 16:46, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of National Geoparks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:27, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confused mess?[edit]

Really not sure what this pages amounts to currently. None of the UNESCO geoparks listed under UK would consider themselves as 'national geoparks' - the term is not in use so why include them? The term is in use elsewhere eg in Germany. cheers Geopersona (talk) 06:57, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed all of the items listed under USA as there is no evidence that any of these are in fact Geoparks. Here si the material should anyone provide proof that they are considered to be 'national Geoparks': Arizona

California

Nevada

South Dakota

Utah

Have also removed others from UK since these too are not known as 'national geoparks' but are UNESCO Global geoparks. Much of the other material in this listing must be considered unreliable. Geopersona (talk) 20:14, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 27 May 2010. Retrieved 25 June 2010. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) blm.gov/ca. Alabama Hills Recreation Area. access date: 5/22/2010.
  2. ^ "Devil's Punchbowl". Devils-punchbowl.com. Retrieved 8 November 2018.
  3. ^ "Joshua Tree National Park". Geotimes.org. Retrieved 8 November 2018.
  4. ^ [1] [dead link]
  5. ^ "Red Rock Canyon - Las Vegas, Nevada". Redrockcanyonlv.org. Retrieved 8 November 2018.
  6. ^ "Nature - Badlands National Park (U.S. National Park Service)". Nps.gov. Retrieved 8 November 2018.

Still a mess[edit]

I'd repeat my statement of 2018- I don't think any of the UNESCO Global geoparks would consider themselves as 'national Geoparks' so each of them should be removed from this page - there are quite a few listed here presently from different nations. And others that are not UNESCO Global Geoparks may not consider themselves as national geoparks either. cheers Geopersona (talk) 10:10, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've been bold and removed all of those in the list which were UNESCO Global Geoparks as at summer 2020 - and listed elsewhere. These are specifically not 'national geoparks' (whatever that term may mean) but international. Since the remaining membership is unreferenced, I'd say the rest can be challenged. If someone can define what a 'national geopark' is and find references to show that any which remain in the list fit that definition then that would be good. cheers Geopersona (talk) 16:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]