Talk:List of offshore wind farms in Denmark

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Starting comments[edit]

Each entry is supposed to be portable to other articles, so [[]]wikilinks are present in each entry regardless of similar wikilinks
4C is (partly) user-driven like Wikipedia, so other references should be added
An offshore wind farm is only considered in operation when it is commissioned by authorities and all equipment is capable of power delivery, but non-commissioned wind farms may be added as long as they are hidden like comments using <!-- comment -->
Article scope is Denmark, not global, so if File:Offshore wind farms by Year&Capacity.PNG is inserted, please highlight Danish wind farms using a bright color.
A window size of 950 pixels wide is about minimum for showing current template/list correctly.
Please copy and develop this template for use in lists for other countries. TGCP (talk) 08:39, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Page is currently under construction to incoorporate advanced features curtesy of User:Ernestfax. See source for more info. TGCP (talk) 16:45, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

I am unsure about what to with Frederikshavn, as turbines have been replaced ? TGCP (talk) 16:31, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

I was working by the ENS spreadsheet, which shows 3 turbines running since Spring 2003: 570715000000057465, 570715000000057472, 570715000000057489 ErnestfaxTalk 18:03, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
That will do for now. Decommissioned turbines show nothing there (none at sea), but I was confused about this [1] showing one in 1986 ! Could be just a landbased one near the town. But there is a more pressing issue; ENS shows when turbines were grid-connected, not when the wind farm was commissioned - that info is somewhat elusive for some farms. TGCP (talk) 18:39, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
fair enough - but as we're only showing the year, and there will only be a short time between connecting the final turbine to the grid, and declaring it fully commissioned, then the year of last turbine connection should be good enough, shouldn't it? ErnestfaxTalk 18:54, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Umm, there really are just three offshore turbines at Frederikshavn, not four. There's only one Vestas 3MW, not two. Check out the google satellite photo from the coordinates link. The other Vestas 3MW is onshore, and has ENS reference 570715000000057458 ErnestfaxTalk 21:47, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
You are right, that shows the value of true references like ENS over semi-refs like 4C. That is a good example to remember to have multiple refs. I guess the land-V90 is part of the park too, but not sufficient to be on this list. TGCP (talk) 22:20, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Actually it seems that only two are in the water, one on the shoreline ("wet feet"), and one on land. TGCP (talk) 22:27, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
"wet feet" is slightly in the water outside the beach, and the "land" one also has wet feet because it is in a pond. I guess ENS goes by "matrikel", and the three seaborne does not have that. "M\atrikel" should then be the deciding factor. TGCP (talk) 22:34, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Yes, it's similar at Rønland I: 4cOffshore has only 4 in the sea (the other 4 being assumed to be on land). Whereas ENS classifies all 8 turbines as HAV, i.e. offshore. From the satellite photo, all 8 are in the sea at least at highest tide - so with wet feet. ErnestfaxTalk 22:45, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Deletion? No, keep[edit]

This article has been nominated for deletion in Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lists_of_wind_turbines_in_Denmark.
I see no reason for that, as the article conforms with Wikipedia:Lists_(stand-alone_lists)#Common_selection_criteria : Short, complete lists of every item that is verifiably a member of the group . TGCP (talk) 07:04, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Deletion is no longer a topic. TGCP (talk) 18:41, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.power-technology.com/projects/rodsand/
    Triggered by \bpower-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
  • http://www.power-technology.com/projects/hornsreefwind/
    Triggered by \bpower-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
  • http://www.power-technology.com/projects/middelgrunden/
    Triggered by \bpower-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 11:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 22:07, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of offshore wind farms in Denmark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:35, 22 May 2017 (UTC)