Talk:List of traffic collisions (2000–present)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Adding to list[edit]

As per the AfD discussion, only accidents which have their own wikipage should be included in this list. Onel5969 TT me 16:24, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Noting that this is clearly no longer the policy, as we have AfD discussion with AfD-merge outcomes to this page; see, for example, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 Galicia bus crash. Klbrain (talk) 13:24, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of notable traffic collisions (2000–present). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:21, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of notable traffic collisions (2000–present). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:18, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: Links to nonexistant articles[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
To include crashes with five deaths or more on this page, even when no article exists. Klbrain (talk) 13:29, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As stated in some related AfDs we should remove red links or even whole entries on this list, which don't have their own articles. Please comment. A09 (talk) 17:05, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If these entries are removed, crashes with over 50 deaths would be deleted, and there would be far less crashes in the article despite their notability. Hopefully articles about these crashes will eventually be created, but for now I think they should be kept. greyzxq talk 17:12, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Greyzxq: Maybe a limit of X deaths should be enforced, just like it's done at List of mass shootings in the United States in 2023 etc. That way we prevent loss of track of bigger events. A09 (talk) 21:41, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It already is, only crashes with five deaths or more are included. greyzxq talk 21:42, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
to fix this i have been going through in my own spare time creating the articles most are very basic just showing data about them however they are still being created everyone is welcome to add to it but what i have / am doing is creating the article :) Dubstar44 (talk) 20:21, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.